On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Gutenkunst, Ryan N - (rgutenk) <
rgut...@email.arizona.edu> wrote:
> Thank Jonathan,
>
> Good to confirm this isn't something inappropriate I'm doing. I give up
> transparency here in my application, so I'll just work around it. I leave
> it up to wiser numpy head
On Mo, 2016-02-15 at 17:06 +, Gutenkunst, Ryan N - (rgutenk) wrote:
> Thank Jonathan,
>
> Good to confirm this isn't something inappropriate I'm doing. I give
> up transparency here in my application, so I'll just work around it.
> I leave it up to wiser numpy heads as to whether it's worth al
Thank Jonathan,
Good to confirm this isn't something inappropriate I'm doing. I give up
transparency here in my application, so I'll just work around it. I leave it up
to wiser numpy heads as to whether it's worth altering these numpy.ma functions
to enable subclassing.
Best,
Ryan
On Feb 13,
On 2/12/16 6:06 PM, Gutenkunst, Ryan N - (rgutenk) wrote:
Hello all,
In 2009 I developed an application that uses a subclass of masked arrays as a
central data object. My subclass Spectrum possesses additional attributes along
with many custom methods. It was very convenient to be able to us
Hello all,
In 2009 I developed an application that uses a subclass of masked arrays as a
central data object. My subclass Spectrum possesses additional attributes along
with many custom methods. It was very convenient to be able to use standard
numpy functions for doing arithmetic on these obje
