Hi,
On 5/27/15, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
>> resources to collaborating with the OpenBLAS team.
>
> Sounds like a great idea to me. Even a bit familiar :-)
>
2015-05-27 10:26 GMT+02:00 Carl Kleffner :
>
>
> 2015-05-27 10:13 GMT+02:00 Nathaniel Smith :
>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Julian Taylor
>> wrote:
>> > On 05/26/2015 04:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
2015-05-27 10:13 GMT+02:00 Nathaniel Smith :
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Julian Taylor
> wrote:
> > On 05/26/2015 04:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
> >> resources to collaborating with the OpenBLAS team.
>
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
> resources to collaborating with the OpenBLAS team.
Sounds like a great idea to me. Even a bit familiar :-)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.ge
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 04:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
>> resources to collaborating with the OpenBLAS team.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is relatively easy to add tests using Python /
Hi,
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 04:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
>> resources to collaborating with the OpenBLAS team.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is relatively easy to add tests using Py
Matthew Brett wrote:
> I am getting the impression that OpenBLAS is looking like the most
> likely medium term solution for open-source stack builds of numpy and
> scipy on Linux and Windows at least.
I think you right.
OpenBLAS might even be a long-term solution. We should also consider that
On 05/26/2015 04:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
> resources to collaborating with the OpenBLAS team.
>
>
>
> It is relatively easy to add tests using Python / numpy. We like
> tests. Why don't we propose a collaborati
Hi,
This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
resources to collaborating with the OpenBLAS team.
Summary: we should explore ways of setting up numpy as a test engine
for OpenBLAS development.
Detail:
I am getting the impression that OpenBLAS is looking like the most
