Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-08 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Charles Doutriaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it is reasonable to say the trunk is in good shape when > the power function does not work... > > Just my thoughts... > Is that ticket #301? What are you suggesting it do? Chuck _

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-08 Thread Charles Doutriaux
I don't think it is reasonable to say the trunk is in good shape when the power function does not work... Just my thoughts... C. Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi Jarrod, > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Hey, > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi Jarrod, On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, > > The trunk is in pretty good shape and it is about time that I put out > an official release. So tomorrow (in a little over twelve hours) I am > going to create a 1.1.x branch and the trunk will be off

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/5/7 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Anne Archibald < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Ah. Good point. I did find a bug - x[:,0] doesn't do what you'd > > > expect. Be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Anne Archibald
2008/5/7 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Heh, I just added some tests to 1.2 before closing ticket #707. They should > probably be merged with yours. Seems a shame: Ran 1000 tests in 5.329s Such a nice round number! Anne ___ Numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/5/7 Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2008/5/7 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Anne Archibald < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > 2008/5/7 Jarrod Millm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Anne Archibald
2008/5/7 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Ah. Good point. I did find a bug - x[:,0] doesn't do what you'd > > expect. Best not release without either backing out my change. I'm > > still trying to track down wh

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Anne Archibald
2008/5/7 Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/5/7 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > 2008/5/7 Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > I have just created the 1.1.x branch: > > > > ht

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/5/7 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Anne Archibald < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > 2008/5/7 Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > I have just created th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Anne Archibald
2008/5/7 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > 2008/5/7 Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I have just created the 1.1.x branch: > > > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/5134 > > > In about

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/5/7 Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I have just created the 1.1.x branch: > > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/5134 > > In about 24 hours I will tag the 1.1.0 release from the branch. At > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Anne Archibald
2008/5/7 Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have just created the 1.1.x branch: > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/5134 > In about 24 hours I will tag the 1.1.0 release from the branch. At > this point only critical bug fixes should be applied to the branch. > The trunk is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
2008/5/7 Albert Strasheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Even better: let the Buildbot do it. > > You should see some Valgrind output appearing in the testing output of > the Linux_x86_Fedora_Py2.6 builder soon. I'll probably have to tune > things a bit to make it go green/red in the right situations.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Albert Strasheim
Hello, On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Albert Strasheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Might be a bit late now, but are you (or is someone) still Valgrinding > NumPy on a semi-regular basis, or at least before a release? Even better: let the Buildbot do it. You should see some Valgrind output ap

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-07 Thread Albert Strasheim
Hello, On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have just created the 1.1.x branch: > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/5134 > In about 24 hours I will tag the 1.1.0 release from the branch. At > this point only critical bug fixes should be ap

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-06 Thread Jarrod Millman
I have just created the 1.1.x branch: http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/5134 In about 24 hours I will tag the 1.1.0 release from the branch. At this point only critical bug fixes should be applied to the branch. The trunk is now open for 1.2 development. Thanks, -- Jarrod Millman

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-06 Thread Bruce Southey
Hi, I think Ticket 605 (Incorrect behaviour of numpy.histogram) can be closed. With regards to Ticket 706 (scalar indexing of matrices -> deprecation warning) I think it should not be a blocker now but should apply the next version. There were many different issues (and threads) raised in the cont

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-06 Thread Anne Archibald
2008/5/6 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 6 May 2008, Jarrod Millman apparently wrote: > > > open tickets that I would like everyone to take a brief > > > look at: > > > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-06 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 May 2008, Jarrod Millman apparently wrote: > > open tickets that I would like everyone to take a brief > > look at: > > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/760 > > My understanding is that my patch, which

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-06 Thread Alan G Isaac
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Jarrod Millman apparently wrote: > open tickets that I would like everyone to take a brief > look at: > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/760 My understanding is that my patch, which would give a deprecation warning, was rejected in favor of the patch specified at

[Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

2008-05-06 Thread Jarrod Millman
Hey, The trunk is in pretty good shape and it is about time that I put out an official release. So tomorrow (in a little over twelve hours) I am going to create a 1.1.x branch and the trunk will be officially open for 1.2 development. If there are no major issues that show up at the last minute,