Re: [Numpy-discussion] Speaking of fft code

2009-06-04 Thread David Cournapeau
Neal Becker wrote: > Has this been considered as a candidate for our fft? > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/kissfft > I looked at it when I was looking for a BSD-compatible FFT with support for prime factors (which fftpack does not handle). As Robert mentioned, I did not see any compelling re

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Speaking of fft code

2009-06-04 Thread Robert Kern
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 13:30, Neal Becker wrote: > Robert Kern wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:58, Neal Becker wrote: >>> Has this been considered as a candidate for our fft? >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/kissfft >> >> No. What would be the advantage of moving to Kiss FFT to offse

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Speaking of fft code

2009-06-04 Thread Neal Becker
Robert Kern wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:58, Neal Becker wrote: >> Has this been considered as a candidate for our fft? >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/kissfft > > No. What would be the advantage of moving to Kiss FFT to offset the cost? > I was reading this: http://listengine.tux

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Speaking of fft code

2009-06-04 Thread Robert Kern
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:58, Neal Becker wrote: > Has this been considered as a candidate for our fft? > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/kissfft No. What would be the advantage of moving to Kiss FFT to offset the cost? -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma

[Numpy-discussion] Speaking of fft code

2009-06-04 Thread Neal Becker
Has this been considered as a candidate for our fft? http://sourceforge.net/projects/kissfft ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion