I got_misled_by (extrapolated erroneously from) this description of
temporaries in the documentation
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/user/basics.indexing.html#assigning-values-to-indexed-arrays
,,,])]" ... new array is extracted from the original (as a temporary)
containing the values at 1, 1, 3,
On Fr, 2015-08-07 at 13:14 +0530, srean wrote:
> Wait, when assignments and slicing mix wasn't the behavior supposed to
> be equivalent to copying the RHS to a temporary and then assigning
> using the temporary. Is that a false memory ? Or has the behavior
> changed ? As long as the behavior is wel
Wait, when assignments and slicing mix wasn't the behavior supposed to be
equivalent to copying the RHS to a temporary and then assigning using the
temporary. Is that a false memory ? Or has the behavior changed ? As long
as the behavior is well defined and succinct it should be ok
On Tuesday, Ju
On Mon Jul 27 22:51:52 2015 GMT+0200, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 27/07/15 22:10, Anton Akhmerov wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have encountered an initially rather confusing problem in a piece of
> > code that attempted to symmetrize a matrix: `h += h.T`
> > The problem of course appears due to
On 27/07/15 22:10, Anton Akhmerov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have encountered an initially rather confusing problem in a piece of
> code that attempted to symmetrize a matrix: `h += h.T`
> The problem of course appears due to `h.T` being a view of `h`, and
> some elements being overwritten during
Hi everyone,
I have encountered an initially rather confusing problem in a piece of
code that attempted to symmetrize a matrix: `h += h.T`
The problem of course appears due to `h.T` being a view of `h`, and
some elements being overwritten during the __iadd__ call.
What made it nasty is that it app
