On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Just to be clear. Are we waiting for the conclusion of the PyArray_Diagonal
> PR before proceeding with this one?
We can talk about this one and everyone's welcome to look at the
patch, of course. (In fact it'd be useful if anyone catch
Just to be clear. Are we waiting for the conclusion of the PyArray_Diagonal
PR before proceeding with this one?
-Travis
On May 20, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> I have not reviewed it in detail, but in general I would
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> I have not reviewed it in detail, but in general I would be very supportive
>> of your plan to commit this to master, make a 1.7 release (without the
>> ReduceWrapper) function and then work on the masked array / ndarray
>> separation p
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ralf, IIUC merging this and my other outstanding PRs would leave the
>> datetime issues on python3/win32 as the only outstanding blocker?
>
>
> Yes. There are some more op
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Wow, Nathaniel. This looks like a nice piece of tedious work.
Honestly, it only took a few hours -- M-x grep is awesome. Would still
have been better if it'd been separated in the first place, but so it
goes.
> I have not reviewed it in
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> Ralf, IIUC merging this and my other outstanding PRs would leave the
> datetime issues on python3/win32 as the only outstanding blocker?
>
Yes. There are some more open tickets for 1.7 (see
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/report/3), bu
Wow, Nathaniel. This looks like a nice piece of tedious work. I have not
reviewed it in detail, but in general I would be very supportive of your plan
to commit this to master, make a 1.7 release (without the ReduceWrapper)
function and then work on the masked array / ndarray separation pl
Hi all,
Since Mark's original missingdata branch made so many changes, I
figured it would be a useful exercise to figure out what code in
master is actually related to masked arrays, and which isn't. The
easiest way seemed to be to delete the new fields, then keep removing
any code that depended o
