Re: [Numpy-discussion] SciPy Journal

2007-06-07 Thread Lou Pecora
Luke, I'd love to see that code and the associated article. I do a lot of NLD. --- Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this Journal sounds like an excellent idea. > I have some > python code that calculates the Lyapunov > Characteristic Exponents (all > of them), for a dynamical system t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] SciPy Journal

2007-06-07 Thread Luke
I think this Journal sounds like an excellent idea. I have some python code that calculates the Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents (all of them), for a dynamical system that I would be willing to write about and contribute. Do you envision the articles including applications of the algorithms/ ide

Re: [Numpy-discussion] SciPy Journal

2007-06-04 Thread Alexander Michael
On 5/31/07, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm sorry for the cross posting, but I wanted to reach a wide audience > and I know not everybody subscribes to all the lists. > > I've been thinking more about the "SciPy Journal" that we discussed > before and I have some

Re: [Numpy-discussion] SciPy Journal

2007-05-31 Thread Travis Oliphant
Christopher Barker wrote: >Anne Archibald wrote: > > >>I implemented the Kuiper statistic and would be happy to >>contribute it to scipy (once it's seen a bit more debugging), but it's >>quite adequately described in the literature already, so it doesn't >>seem worth writing an article about it.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] SciPy Journal

2007-05-31 Thread Christopher Barker
Anne Archibald wrote: > I implemented the Kuiper statistic and would be happy to > contribute it to scipy (once it's seen a bit more debugging), but it's > quite adequately described in the literature already, so it doesn't > seem worth writing an article about it. It could be a very short article

Re: [Numpy-discussion] SciPy Journal

2007-05-31 Thread Travis Oliphant
Matthieu Brucher wrote: > > For this point, I have the same opinion as Anne : > - having an equivalence between cde and article is raising the entry > level, but as Anne said, some code could be somehow too trivial ? > - a peer-review process implies that an article can be rejected, so > the cod

Re: [Numpy-discussion] SciPy Journal

2007-05-31 Thread Travis Oliphant
Anne Archibald wrote: >On 31/05/07, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>2) I think it's scope should be limited to papers that describe >>algorithms and code that are in NumPy / SciPy / SciKits. Perhaps we >>could also accept papers that describe code that depends on NumPy / >>S

Re: [Numpy-discussion] SciPy Journal

2007-05-30 Thread Matthieu Brucher
Hi, 1) I'd like to get it going so that we can push out an electronic issue after the SciPy conference (in September) That would be great for the "fame" of numpy and scipy :) 2) I think it's scope should be limited to papers that describe algorithms and code that are in NumPy / SciPy / Sci

Re: [Numpy-discussion] SciPy Journal

2007-05-30 Thread Anne Archibald
On 31/05/07, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2) I think it's scope should be limited to papers that describe > algorithms and code that are in NumPy / SciPy / SciKits. Perhaps we > could also accept papers that describe code that depends on NumPy / > SciPy that is also easily availa

[Numpy-discussion] SciPy Journal

2007-05-30 Thread Travis Oliphant
Hi everybody, I'm sorry for the cross posting, but I wanted to reach a wide audience and I know not everybody subscribes to all the lists. I've been thinking more about the "SciPy Journal" that we discussed before and I have some thoughts. 1) I'd like to get it going so that we can push out