I am really excited to see that we have a great agenda for the BoF, I hope
that the discussion will be fruitful!
Kyle
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Fernando Perez
wrote:
> Great, thanks! And we can certainly try to either move into planning at
> the end, or plan for such afterwards.
>
> Be
Great, thanks! And we can certainly try to either move into planning at the
end, or plan for such afterwards.
Best
f
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, J
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Fernando Perez
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've just created a page on the numpy wiki:
>>
>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numpy-BoF-at-Scipy-2014
>>
>> I'd appreciate it if people could put
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Fernando Perez
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just created a page on the numpy wiki:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numpy-BoF-at-Scipy-2014
>
> I'd appreciate it if people could put down on that page the title of
> topics, plus a brief summary (with links to
Hi folks,
I've just created a page on the numpy wiki:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numpy-BoF-at-Scipy-2014
I'd appreciate it if people could put down on that page the title of
topics, plus a brief summary (with links to this or other relevant
threads), they'd like to see discussed.
BoFs
On Jun 27, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
> Hi Kyle,
>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:40 I'd like to propose adopting something like the
>> Blaze standard for datetime,
+1 for some focused discussion of datetime. This has been lingering
far too long.
-Chris
__
Hi Kyle,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Fernando Perez has volunteered to act as a facilitator for a BoF on NumPy
> if there is still interest in having this discussion. I can make sure that
> it is not scheduled in conjunction with some of the other plan
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Fernando Perez has volunteered to act as a facilitator for a BoF on NumPy
> if there is still interest in having this discussion. I can make sure that
> it is not scheduled in conjunction with some of the other planned BoFs t
Hi Everyone,
Fernando Perez has volunteered to act as a facilitator for a BoF on NumPy
if there is still interest in having this discussion. I can make sure that
it is not scheduled in conjunction with some of the other planned BoFs that
may interest this crowd. If someone could take the lead on
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote:
> In the past I know that we have simply gathered in a circle and discussed
> which works as well. Whatever the case, if someone could volunteer to
> "lead" the discussion
>
It's my experience that a really good facilitator could make all the
Hi Kyle
Kyle Mandli writes:
> The BoF format would be up to those who would lead
> the discussion, a couple of ideas used in the past include picking out a
> few of the lead devs to be on a panel and have a Q&A type of session or an
> open Q&A with perhaps audience guided list of topics.
Unfortu
It sounds like there is a lot to discuss come July and I am sure there will
be others "willing" to voice their opinions as well. The primary goal in
all of this would be to have a constructive discussion concerning the
future of NumPy, do you guys have a feeling for what might be the most
effectiv
I won't be able to make it at scipy this year sadly.
I concur with Nathaniel that we can do a lot of things without a full
rewrite -- it is all too easy to see what is gained with a rewrite and lose
sight of what is lost. I have yet to see a really strong argument for a
full rewrite. It may be eas
On Mi, 2014-06-04 at 02:26 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> As one of the co-chairs in charge of organizing the birds-of-a-feather
> >> sesssions at
I will be at the conference as will Mark Wiebe for at least part of the
time. Others from the Blaze team like Andy Terrel and Matthew Rocklin will
also be available at least part of the time (so it depends on when the BoF
is). I'm sure they will all have opinions about this. I would be happy
t
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> As one of the co-chairs in charge of organizing the birds-of-a-feather
>> sesssions at the SciPy conference this year, I wanted to solicit through the
>> NumPy
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As one of the co-chairs in charge of organizing the birds-of-a-feather
> sesssions at the SciPy conference this year, I wanted to solicit through
> the NumPy list to see if we could get enough interest to hold a NumPy
> cent
Hello everyone,
As one of the co-chairs in charge of organizing the birds-of-a-feather
sesssions at the SciPy conference this year, I wanted to solicit through
the NumPy list to see if we could get enough interest to hold a NumPy
centered BoF this year. The BoF format would be up to those who wou
18 matches
Mail list logo
