On 6/20/08, Gael Varoquaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to figure the right way of looping throught ndarrays using
> Cython, currently. Things seem to have evolved a bit compared to what
> some documents on the web claim (eg "for i from 0<=i faster than "for i in range(n)").
Regard
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 14:13, Gael Varoquaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:07:08PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
>> > Does somebody have a example of fast looping through ndarrays using
>> > modern Cython idioms?
>
>> If you're using normal Python indexing, then that's where
Oups, forgot the attachement.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:13:34PM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:07:08PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
> > > Does somebody have a example of fast looping through ndarrays using
> > > modern Cython idioms?
> > If you're using normal Python inde
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:07:08PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
> > Does somebody have a example of fast looping through ndarrays using
> > modern Cython idioms?
> If you're using normal Python indexing, then that's where all your
> time is being spent. You need to grab the actual .data pointer and d
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:17, Gael Varoquaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to figure the right way of looping throught ndarrays using
> Cython, currently. Things seem to have evolved a bit compared to what
> some documents on the web claim (eg "for i from 0<=i faster than "for i
Hi,
I am trying to figure the right way of looping throught ndarrays using
Cython, currently. Things seem to have evolved a bit compared to what
some documents on the web claim (eg "for i from 0<=ihttp://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
