Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-25 Thread Matthieu Brucher
> As a footnote to this query, has the Scons community > addressed the problem Scons had working with VS 2008 (=VS9)? No. I'm still facing the same issues, but I'll try to help David Cournapeau with his work on that (he is trying to simplify all Visual Studio supports). Matthieu -- French PhD st

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-25 Thread Bruce Southey
Robert Kern wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:58, Bruce Southey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I think this is a great idea but I am curious about what NumPy will be >> doing with Python 3. The Python 3 final is scheduled for 1st October >> release so is there a policy on handling the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-24 Thread Robert Kern
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:58, Bruce Southey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I think this is a great idea but I am curious about what NumPy will be > doing with Python 3. The Python 3 final is scheduled for 1st October > release so is there a policy on handling the migration to Python 3 or > dua

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-24 Thread Alan G Isaac
Bruce Southey wrote: > I think this is a great idea but I am curious about what NumPy will be > doing with Python 3. The Python 3 final is scheduled for 1st October > release so is there a policy on handling the migration to Python 3 or > dual support of the 2 and 3 series? As a footnote to th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-24 Thread Bruce Southey
Hi, I think this is a great idea but I am curious about what NumPy will be doing with Python 3. The Python 3 final is scheduled for 1st October release so is there a policy on handling the migration to Python 3 or dual support of the 2 and 3 series? Thanks Bruce On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:39 PM, T

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-24 Thread Jon Wright
Travis E. Oliphant wrote: > ... > * Thus 1.2 will not break ABI compatibility but will add new API features. > This is really great news (amongst the other good things). Many thanks for keeping the ABI compatible! All the best, Jon . ___ Numpy-disc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-23 Thread Keith Goodman
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 7:04 PM, James A. Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > >> 2008/8/23 Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> By the way, as promised, the NumPy book is now available for download >>> and the source to the book is check

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-23 Thread James A. Benson
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: 2008/8/23 Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: By the way, as promised, the NumPy book is now available for download and the source to the book is checked in to the numpy SVN tree: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/trunk/numpy/doc/numpybook We

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-23 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Robert K, Chuck H, Stefan VdW, Jarrod M, David C, and I had a nice > discussion about the future directions of NumPy. We resolved some > things and would like community feedback on them if there are

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-23 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
2008/8/23 Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > By the way, as promised, the NumPy book is now available for download > and the source to the book is checked in to the numpy SVN tree: > > http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/trunk/numpy/doc/numpybook We just reorganised the docs somewhat, so this U

[Numpy-discussion] Report from SciPy

2008-08-23 Thread Travis E. Oliphant
Hi everybody, Robert K, Chuck H, Stefan VdW, Jarrod M, David C, and I had a nice discussion about the future directions of NumPy. We resolved some things and would like community feedback on them if there are opinions. * we will be moving to time-based releases (at least 2 times a year -- N