On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > It seems I've crawled a bit further up the learning curve since last time
> I
> > tried. Scipy binaries for python 2.5 (built against numpy 1.2) are now on
> > Sourceforge, please
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> Ralf Gommers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy
>> 0.7.2 and NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the
>> NumPy or SciPy list.
>
> I had a round of segfaults in the SciPy/NumPy interlink, which I
>
Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2
> and NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the NumPy or
> SciPy list.
I had a round of segfaults in the SciPy/NumPy interlink, which I
eventually tracked down to a leftover _d
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase
>>> wrote:
Hi,
Congratulations. I might
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I
>>> supposed to use with the ne
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I
>> supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised
>> that there are no SciPy
On 04/19/2010 04:45 PM, Matthieu Brucher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile scipy with ICC (numpy got through correctly),
> but I have issue with infinites in cephes:
>
> icc: scipy/special/cephes/const.c
> scipy/special/cephes/const.c(94): error: floating-point operation
> result is out of ran
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Matthieu Brucher <
matthieu.bruc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW, there still is an error with ifort, so scipy is still
> incompatible with the Intel compilers (which is at least very sad...)
>
> Is this true for trunk as well? Scipy 0.7 branch has hardly been touched
f
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
> Hi,
> Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I
> supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised
> that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that
> technically not possibl
BTW, there still is an error with ifort, so scipy is still
incompatible with the Intel compilers (which is at least very sad...)
Matthieu
2010/4/19 Matthieu Brucher :
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile scipy with ICC (numpy got through correctly),
> but I have issue with infinites in cephes:
>
> icc
Hi,
I'm trying to compile scipy with ICC (numpy got through correctly),
but I have issue with infinites in cephes:
icc: scipy/special/cephes/const.c
scipy/special/cephes/const.c(94): error: floating-point operation
result is out of range
double INFINITY = 1.0/0.0; /* 99e999; */
Hi,
Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I
supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised
that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that
technically not possible ?
Thanks,
Sebastian Haase
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Ralf
Hi,
I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2 and
NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the NumPy or SciPy
list.
Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/f
13 matches
Mail list logo
