Neal Becker wrote:
> I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
> indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It
> goes completely counter to the python philosophy.
>
> I vote to ban them from numpy.
from numpy import array
x = array (
Neal Becker wrote:
> Robert Kern wrote:
>
>> Neal Becker wrote:
>>> I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
>>> indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It
>>> goes completely counter to the python philosophy.
>>>
>>> I vote to ban them fro
On Jan 14, 2008 12:37 PM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
> indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It
> goes
> completely counter to the python philosophy.
>
> I vote to ban them from numpy
Robert Kern wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
>> indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It
>> goes completely counter to the python philosophy.
>>
>> I vote to ban them from numpy.
> from numpy im
Neal Becker wrote:
> I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
> indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It goes
> completely counter to the python philosophy.
>
> I vote to ban them from numpy.
from numpy import array
x = array (x
I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It goes
completely counter to the python philosophy.
I vote to ban them from numpy.
>>> from numpy import array
>>> x = array (xrange (10))
>>> x[11]
Traceback
