Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 3.n and Scipy Numpy

2009-07-31 Thread BBands
A short field report. Python 2.6.2 installed and working with the latest versions of: numpy scipy MySQLdb gnuplot.py and gnuplot rpy and R 2.9.1 PyScripter PyWin32 Rpyc 2.6 The little bit of 3.n syntax I have tried works. So far, this seems like a stable and trouble-free stack. Thanks for the f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 3.n and Scipy Numpy

2009-07-30 Thread BBands
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Neil Martinsen-Burrell wrote: > On 2009-07-30 14:13 , BBands wrote: >> Could someone point me toward some information on Scipy/Numpy and >> Python 3.1? I'd like to upgrade, but can't seem to find the path. > > There is no such path right now.  Numpy and Scipy are o

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 3.n and Scipy Numpy

2009-07-30 Thread Ryan May
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:13 PM, BBands wrote: > Could someone point me toward some information on Scipy/Numpy and > Python 3.1? I'd like to upgrade, but can't seem to find the path. Scipy/Numpy are have not yet been ported to python 3.x Ryan -- Ryan May Graduate Research Assistant School of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 3.n and Scipy Numpy

2009-07-30 Thread Neil Martinsen-Burrell
On 2009-07-30 14:13 , BBands wrote: > Could someone point me toward some information on Scipy/Numpy and > Python 3.1? I'd like to upgrade, but can't seem to find the path. There is no such path right now. Numpy and Scipy are only available for Python 2.x (with x >= 4). As very large C extension

[Numpy-discussion] Python 3.n and Scipy Numpy

2009-07-30 Thread BBands
Could someone point me toward some information on Scipy/Numpy and Python 3.1? I'd like to upgrade, but can't seem to find the path. jab ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussi