Re: [Numpy-discussion] Py3k and numpy

2008-12-04 Thread Lisandro Dalcin
>From my experience working on my own projects and Cython: * the C code making Python C-API calls could be made to version-agnostic by using preprocessor macros, and even some compatibility header conditionally included. Perhaps the later would be the easiest for C-API calls (we have a lot already

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Py3k and numpy

2008-12-04 Thread David Cournapeau
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:57, Charles R Harris > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Erik Tollerud <[EM

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Py3k and numpy

2008-12-04 Thread Jarrod Millman
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Tommy Grav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 4, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Robert Kern wrote: >> It does. What problems are people seeing? Is it just the Windows build >> that causes people to say "numpy doesn't work with Python 2.6"? > > There is currently no official Mac

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Py3k and numpy

2008-12-04 Thread Tommy Grav
On Dec 4, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > It does. What problems are people seeing? Is it just the Windows build > that causes people to say "numpy doesn't work with Python 2.6"? There is currently no official Mac OSX binary for numpy for python 2.6, but you can build it from source. Is the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Py3k and numpy

2008-12-04 Thread Robert Kern
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:57, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I noticed that the Python 3000 final was release

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Py3k and numpy

2008-12-04 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> I noticed that the Python 3000 final was released today... is there >> any sense of how long it will take to get numpy working under 3k? I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Py3k and numpy

2008-12-04 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I noticed that the Python 3000 final was released today... is there > any sense of how long it will take to get numpy working under 3k? I > would imagine it'll be a lot to adapt given the low-level change, but > is the work

[Numpy-discussion] Py3k and numpy

2008-12-04 Thread Erik Tollerud
I noticed that the Python 3000 final was released today... is there any sense of how long it will take to get numpy working under 3k? I would imagine it'll be a lot to adapt given the low-level change, but is the work already in progress? ___ Numpy-discu