Hi,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to merge the following pull requests sometime today:
>>>
>>> * 326 -- inplace increment function
On Jul 17, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>
>> I would like to merge the following pull requests sometime today:
>>
>> * 326 -- inplace increment function
>
> -1, for the reasons stated in the comment thread -- we shouldn't
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> I would like to merge the following pull requests sometime today:
>
> * 326 -- inplace increment function
-1, for the reasons stated in the comment thread -- we shouldn't lock
ourselves into an ugly API when there's discussion going on a
I (or somebody else) needs to fix 325, Ralf pointed out that I was slightly
too aggressive preferring gfortran on vendor operating systems. I think I
should be able to fix this in the next couple of hours, I've been
delinquent in getting back to it.
A
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Travis Olip
I would like to merge the following pull requests sometime today:
* 326 -- inplace increment function
* 325 -- prefer gfortran on OSX and Linux
* 192 -- meshgrid enhancements
* 327 -- restore commas and update C-API doc a bit
* 352 -- simplifying case for insert and adding tests (#2028)
* 350 --
