On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:33:01PM -0500, David Huard wrote:
> Change done.
>
> All tests pass.
Now's a good time to fix that :)
Cheers
Stéfan
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy
Change done.
All tests pass.
Should I document the change somewhere ? Although it's a small change, I'm
guessing it could be very annoying to debug for someone depending on the
previous behavior.
2007/12/13, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> David Huard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The curr
David Huard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current behavior of numpy's binary_repr is the following:
>
> >>> binary_repr(1,width=2)
> '01'
>
> >>> binary_repr(0,width=2)
> '0'
>
> This seems inconsistent and I'd suggest always padding with zeros to
> make sure that the return string always has length=width.
Hi,
The current behavior of numpy's binary_repr is the following:
>>> binary_repr(1,width=2)
'01'
>>> binary_repr(0,width=2)
'0'
This seems inconsistent and I'd suggest always padding with zeros to make
sure that the return string always has length=width.
Objections ?
David
_
