Re: [Numpy-discussion] Procedure for doing documentation reviews

2009-10-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:16 AM, David Goldsmith wrote: > Technically, after "Needs Review," it's supposed to go through "Needs Work > (Reviewed)" The "by the book" way to do it would be to: > > 0 & 1) Provide comments in the Discussion section and change status to > "Needs Work (Reviewed)" (in e

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Procedure for doing documentation reviews

2009-10-25 Thread David Goldsmith
Technically, after "Needs Review," it's supposed to go through "Needs Work (Reviewed)" The "by the book" way to do it would be to: 0 & 1) Provide comments in the Discussion section and change status to "Needs Work (Reviewed)" (in either order); 2) Edit, if inclined. 3) Answer your own comments

[Numpy-discussion] Procedure for doing documentation reviews

2009-10-25 Thread Christopher Burns
When a documents status is "Needs Review" and when reviewing it we feel it needs edits, should we add comments regarding the edits, or should we feel free to edit it directly? Chris ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail