Re: [Numpy-discussion] problems building numpy with ACML blas/lapack

2014-02-27 Thread Thomas Unterthiner
Hi! (I was contacted about this off-list, but thought it might be worth it to document this on-list) I don't remember ever running into problems while using ACML in my numpy installs. However I never ran the whole test-suite, and I never used np.einsum (or complex numbers) in my own code. Al

[Numpy-discussion] problems building numpy with ACML blas/lapack

2014-02-24 Thread Michael Hughes
Hello, I'm trying to build numpy from source to use AMD's ACML for matrix multiplication (specifically the multi-threaded versions gfortran64_mp). I'm able to successfully compile and use a working version of np.dot, but my resulting installation doesn't pass numpy's test suite, instead, I get a s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2011-03-28 Thread Giuseppe Aprea
Dear Paul Anton, thanks a lot for your suggestion. I was also successful with [blas] libraries = blas library_dirs = $PREFIX/gotoblas2/lib [lapack] libraries = lapack library_dirs = $PREFIX/gotoblas2/lib but I had compile clapack as a shared library and place a symbolic link ln -s $PREFIX/gotobl

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2011-03-23 Thread Sturla Molden
Den 22.03.2011 23:18, skrev Paul Anton Letnes: I'm no expert, but I just pulled off the scipy+numpy+GotoBLAS2 installation. From what I gather, the Makefile for libgoto2 downloads and compiles the generic lapack from netlib. It also wraps lapack into libgoto2.so/.a . I be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2011-03-22 Thread Paul Anton Letnes
I'm no expert, but I just pulled off the scipy+numpy+GotoBLAS2 installation. >From what I gather, the Makefile for libgoto2 downloads and compiles the generic lapack from netlib. It also wraps lapack into libgoto2.so/.a. I believe the idea is as long as the BLAS implementation is fast(TM), the lapa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2011-03-22 Thread Giuseppe Aprea
Hi all, I wonder if Peter finally got Gotoblas working with numpy. I am trying with gotoblas 1.13 installed in the same way: $ ls -R .: include lib ./include: goto ./include/goto: blaswrap.h cblas.h clapack.h f2c.h ./lib: libgoto2.a libgoto2_nehalemp-r1.13.a libgoto2_nehalemp-r1.13.so li

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2010-08-18 Thread Eloi Gaudry
Peter, As mentionned, you need to replace the values of GOTODIR, LAPACKDIR and PYTHONDIR in this script with the ones matching your environment. Eloi On Wednesday 18 August 2010 00:39:48 ashf...@whisperpc.com wrote: > Eloi, > > > please below a script that will build numpy using a relevant sit

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2010-08-17 Thread David
On 08/18/2010 07:39 AM, ashf...@whisperpc.com wrote: > Eloi, > >> please below a script that will build numpy using a relevant site.cfg for >> your >> configuration (you need to update GOTODIR and LAPACKDIR and PYTHONDIR): > >> #copy site.cfg >> cp ./site.cfg PYTHONDIR/lib/python2.6/site-packages/

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2010-08-17 Thread David
On 08/17/2010 08:43 PM, Eloi Gaudry wrote: > Peter, > > please below a script that will build numpy using a relevant site.cfg for > your configuration (you need to update GOTODIR and LAPACKDIR and PYTHONDIR): > > #!/bin/sh > > #BLAS/LAPACK configuration file > echo "[blas]"> ./site.cfg > echo "l

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2010-08-17 Thread ashford
Eloi, > please below a script that will build numpy using a relevant site.cfg for your > configuration (you need to update GOTODIR and LAPACKDIR and PYTHONDIR): > #copy site.cfg > cp ./site.cfg PYTHONDIR/lib/python2.6/site-packages/numpy/distutils/. I believe this needs a $ prior to PYTHONDIR.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2010-08-17 Thread Eloi Gaudry
Peter, please below a script that will build numpy using a relevant site.cfg for your configuration (you need to update GOTODIR and LAPACKDIR and PYTHONDIR): #!/bin/sh #BLAS/LAPACK configuration file echo "[blas]" > ./site.cfg echo "library_dirs = GOTODIR">> ./

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2010-08-16 Thread ashford
David, > You should instead specificaly link the GOTO library to > numpy, by customizing the site.cfg, That was one of the many things I tried came to the list. Peter Ashford ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.sci

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2010-08-16 Thread David
On 08/17/2010 01:58 PM, ashf...@whisperpc.com wrote: > I'm having problems getting the GotoBLAS library (Nehalem optimized BLAS - > "http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/gotoblas2/";) working properly under > the Python NumPy package ("http://numpy.scipy.org/";) on a quad-core Nehalem > under F

[Numpy-discussion] Problems building NumPy with GotoBLAS

2010-08-16 Thread ashford
I'm having problems getting the GotoBLAS library (Nehalem optimized BLAS - "http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/gotoblas2/";) working properly under the Python NumPy package ("http://numpy.scipy.org/";) on a quad-core Nehalem under FC10. The command used to build the library is: make BINA

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

2008-11-26 Thread David Cournapeau
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Michael Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why? What do you think makes sunperf problematic? [Not that I want to do > the work, just curious :)] I *know* it will be difficult :) The problem of sunperf is that you cannot just link a few libraries to make it wor

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

2008-11-26 Thread Michael Abshoff
David Cournapeau wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Peter Norton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:28 PM, David Cournapeau >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Charles R Harris wrote: What happens if you go the usual python setup.py {build,install} route? >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

2008-11-26 Thread David Cournapeau
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Peter Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:28 PM, David Cournapeau > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Charles R Harris wrote: >> > >> > >> > What happens if you go the usual python setup.py {build,install} route? >> >> Won't go far sinc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

2008-11-26 Thread Peter Norton
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:28 PM, David Cournapeau < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > What happens if you go the usual python setup.py {build,install} route? > > Won't go far since it does not handle sunperf. > > David Even though the regular build process appears

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

2008-11-25 Thread David Cournapeau
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Peter Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > scons: warning: Ignoring missing SConscript > 'build/scons/numpy/core/SConscript' > File > "/usr/local/python-2.5.1/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numscons-0.9.4-py2.5.egg/numscons/core/numpyenv.py", > line 108, in Distutils

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

2008-11-25 Thread David Cournapeau
Charles R Harris wrote: > > > What happens if you go the usual python setup.py {build,install} route? Won't go far since it does not handle sunperf. David ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/lis

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

2008-11-25 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Peter Norton < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Back in the beginning of the summer, I jumped through a lot of hoops to > build numpy+scipy on solaris, 64-bit with gcc. I received a lot of help from > David C., and ended up, by some very ugly hacking, building an accept

[Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

2008-11-25 Thread Peter Norton
Back in the beginning of the summer, I jumped through a lot of hoops to build numpy+scipy on solaris, 64-bit with gcc. I received a lot of help from David C., and ended up, by some very ugly hacking, building an acceptable numpy+scipy+matplotlib trio for use at my company. However, I'm back at it

[Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy using setupegg

2007-11-16 Thread Chris
I am trying to build some installers of numpy using setuptools and bdist_mpkg on Leopard using the following command: python setupegg.py config_fc --fcompiler gnu95 config -L../staticlibs build bdist_mpkg --open However, I get the following error towards the end of the build: Copyi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy

2007-07-16 Thread Matthieu Brucher
As for my unrelated question, I was still wondering if anyone has any information about the relative merits of MKL vs ATLAS etc. MKL is parallized, so until ATLAS is as well, MKL has the upper hand. Matthieu ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy

2007-07-16 Thread Robin Ince
Hi, Thanks for the responses. On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:37:52 -0700, "Christopher Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > CygWin is NOT the same as MinGW. They both are gcc, but IIUC, cygwin > builds against the cygwin unix-like standard libs, and MinGW builds > against the system libs -- so only MinGW

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy

2007-07-13 Thread Christopher Barker
> I am using Windows XP SP2, with latest Cygwin and I'm trying to follow > the instructions on the wiki. > > Firstly, is what I'm trying possible? On the Installing Scipy/Windows > page it says MinGW gcc and g77 are best supported, but also says to > build against binary Pytho

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy

2007-07-13 Thread Timothy Hochberg
FWIW, I'm fairly certain that the binaries for win32 are compiled using mingw, so I'm pretty certain that it's possible. I use MSVCC myself, so I can't be of much help though. On 7/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, By making replacing line 807 in fcompiler/__init__.py (

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy

2007-07-13 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am keen to evaluate numpy as an alternative to MATLAB for my PhD work > and possible wider use within the department. To make a fairer > comparison I wanted to build it with optimised ATLAS/LAPACK etc. hence > building from source. Far and away the easiest solution is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy

2007-07-13 Thread Matthieu Brucher
Hi, What version of MSVC are you using ? If you really want to have an optimized version, don't use mingw (gcc is not up to date). Matthieu 2007/7/13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, I am keen to evaluate numpy as an alternative to MATLAB for my PhD work and possible wider use w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy

2007-07-13 Thread numpy-discussion
Hi, By making replacing line 807 in fcompiler/__init__.py (return None) with: from numpy.distutils.fcompiler.none import NoneFCompiler compiler = NoneFCompiler() return compiler I have been able to get a little bit further with my problems. I'm not sure if this is the corr

[Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy

2007-07-13 Thread numpy-discussion
Hi, I am keen to evaluate numpy as an alternative to MATLAB for my PhD work and possible wider use within the department. To make a fairer comparison I wanted to build it with optimised ATLAS/LAPACK etc. hence building from source. I am running into some problems though. I am using Windows XP SP

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy and scipy on AIX

2007-04-22 Thread David M. Cooke
On Apr 21, 2007, at 09:03 , Christian Marquardt wrote: Yes, that worked - many thanks! FWIW, svn should work out of the box now. On Thu, April 19, 2007 22:38, David M. Cooke wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Marquardt wrote: Dear David, the svn version of nu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy and scipy on AIX

2007-04-21 Thread Christian Marquardt
Yes, that worked - many thanks! Christian. On Thu, April 19, 2007 22:38, David M. Cooke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Christian Marquardt wrote: >> Dear David, >> >> the svn version of numpy does indeed build cleanly on AIX. Many thanks! >> >> However, the wrapp

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy and scipy on AIX

2007-04-19 Thread David M. Cooke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Marquardt wrote: > Dear David, > > the svn version of numpy does indeed build cleanly on AIX. Many thanks! > > However, the wrapper problem still exists for the C++ compiler, and shows > up when compiling scipy. Now, I *assume* that SciPy i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy and scipy on AIX

2007-04-18 Thread Christian Marquardt
Dear David, the svn version of numpy does indeed build cleanly on AIX. Many thanks! However, the wrapper problem still exists for the C++ compiler, and shows up when compiling scipy. Now, I *assume* that SciPy is using the distutils as installed by numpy. Do you know where the linker settings for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy and scipy on AIX

2007-04-18 Thread David M. Cooke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Marquardt wrote: > Hello, > > I've run into a problem building numpy-1.0.2 on AIX (using gcc and native > Fortran compilers). The problem on that platform in general is that the > process for building shared libraries is different from what'

[Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy and scipy on AIX

2007-04-18 Thread Christian Marquardt
Hello, I've run into a problem building numpy-1.0.2 on AIX (using gcc and native Fortran compilers). The problem on that platform in general is that the process for building shared libraries is different from what's normally done (and it's a pain...) Anyway. Core python has a dedicated script cal