On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ake Sandgren wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 09:44 +, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> That does look unlikely yeah... Does this have any consequences that
>> you've found? Is there a test case that fails before the patch but
>> works after?
>
> No, just found it durin
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 09:44 +, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> That does look unlikely yeah... Does this have any consequences that
> you've found? Is there a test case that fails before the patch but
> works after?
No, just found it during compilation with the intel compiler. It
complained about use
That does look unlikely yeah... Does this have any consequences that you've
found? Is there a test case that fails before the patch but works after?
-n
On 15 Mar 2013 09:19, "Ake Sandgren" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Found this thing that looks like a bug in
> core/src/multiarray/dtype_transfer.c
>
> diff
Hi!
Found this thing that looks like a bug in
core/src/multiarray/dtype_transfer.c
diff -ru site/numpy/core/src/multiarray/dtype_transfer.c
amd64_ubuntu1004-intel-acml/numpy/core/src/multiarray/dtype_transfer.c
--- site/numpy/core/src/multiarray/dtype_transfer.c 2011-07-20
20:25:28.0