On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:20 PM, S. Chris Colbert wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 19:59 +0100, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> > (First off, is it OK to continue polling the NumPy list now and then on
> > Cython language decisions? Or should I expect that any interested Cython
> > users follow the Cy
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 19:59 +0100, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> (First off, is it OK to continue polling the NumPy list now and then on
> Cython language decisions? Or should I expect that any interested Cython
> users follow the Cython list?)
>
> In Python, if I write "-1 % 5", I get 4. Howeve
Robert Kern wrote:
>>> # Explicitly declared C types?
>>> cdef long i, j, k
>>> i = -1
>>> j = 5
>>> k = i % j
>> This one is what I'm really asking about.
>
> My opinion on this is that C semantics have been explicitly requested,
> so they should be used.
maybe ...
> One possibility (
On 3/13/2009 12:47 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> (Introducing a new set of types for "typed Python" is an idea that could
> please everybody, but I fear the confusion it would bring myself...)
AFAIK, Python 3 has optional type annotations.
Sturla Molden
__
Sturla Molden wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:41, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>
>
>
# Explicitly declared C types?
cdef long i, j, k
i = -1
j = 5
k = i % j
>>> This one is what I'm really asking about.
>>>
>> My opinion on this is that
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:41, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> # Explicitly declared C types?
>>> cdef long i, j, k
>>> i = -1
>>> j = 5
>>> k = i % j
>>
>> This one is what I'm really asking about.
>
> My opinion on this is that C semantics have been explicitly requested,
> so they should be
Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>
>
>> One possibility (that may be opening a can of worms) is to have two
>> sets of operators, one that does "native" semantics (C for cdef longs,
>> Python for Python ints) and one that does Python semantics even on
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> One possibility (that may be opening a can of worms) is to have two
> sets of operators, one that does "native" semantics (C for cdef longs,
> Python for Python ints) and one that does Python semantics even on
> cdef longs. I leave it to you
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:41, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> Robert Kern wrote:
>> That may be part of the confusion. The expression "-1%5" has no
>> variables. Perhaps Dag can clarify what he is asking about:
>>
>> # Constants? (No one uses just constants in expressions,
>> # really, but co
Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 17:45, Sturla Molden wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> 2009/3/13 Charles R Harris :
That said, I think it best to leave '%' with its C default and add a
special
modulus function for the python version. Changing its meaning in C-like
code
is g
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 17:45, Sturla Molden wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> 2009/3/13 Charles R Harris :
>>> That said, I think it best to leave '%' with its C default and add a
>>> special
>>> modulus function for the python version. Changing its meaning in C-like
>>> code
>>> is going to confuse things.
>>
>
> 2009/3/13 Charles R Harris :
>> That said, I think it best to leave '%' with its C default and add a
>> special
>> modulus function for the python version. Changing its meaning in C-like
>> code
>> is going to confuse things.
>
> This is Cython code, so I think there is an argument to be made
2009/3/13 Charles R Harris :
> That said, I think it best to leave '%' with its C default and add a special
> modulus function for the python version. Changing its meaning in C-like code
> is going to confuse things.
This is Cython code, so I think there is an argument to be made that
it is Python
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <
da...@student.matnat.uio.no> wrote:
> (First off, is it OK to continue polling the NumPy list now and then on
> Cython language decisions? Or should I expect that any interested Cython
> users follow the Cython list?)
>
> In Python, if I wri
Hi Dag
2009/3/12 Dag Sverre Seljebotn :
> (First off, is it OK to continue polling the NumPy list now and then on
> Cython language decisions? Or should I expect that any interested Cython
> users follow the Cython list?)
Given that many of the subscribers make use of the NumPy support in
Cython,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:59:48PM +0100, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> (First off, is it OK to continue polling the NumPy list now and then on
> Cython language decisions? Or should I expect that any interested Cython
> users follow the Cython list?)
Yes, IMHO.
> In Python, if I write "-1 % 5"
(First off, is it OK to continue polling the NumPy list now and then on
Cython language decisions? Or should I expect that any interested Cython
users follow the Cython list?)
In Python, if I write "-1 % 5", I get 4. However, in C if I write "-1 %
5" I get -1. The question is, what should I get
17 matches
Mail list logo
