> Paul Ivanov wrote:
> > ... But I just came across a wonderfully short signature from
> > Rick Moen, and thought I'd pass it along:
>
> > Cheers, A: Yes.
> > Rick Moen > Q: Are you sure?
> > rick@linuxmafia >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of
> > conversation
On 12.04.2013, at 6:01PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
wrote:
> Maybe we need a short-hand for "clean up the previous parts of the
> thread to show only what you need to make your post relevant and
> clear"
>
+1
> Paul Ivanof wrote:
>> ... But I just came across a wonderfully short signature fr
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Derek Homeier
wrote:
> In German this kind of faux pas is usually labelled "TOFU" for "text on top,
> full quote underneath",
> and I think it has been a bit overlooked so far that the "full quote" part
> probably is the bigger problem.
Exactly -- my original t
On 12.04.2013, at 2:14AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Colin J. Williams
> wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 7:20 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Doug Coleman wrote:
>>
>> Also, gmail "bottom-posts" by default. It's transparent to gmail users. I'd
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Colin J. Williams
wrote:
> PS My last posting used the word Anaconda. It was squelched.
What posting are you referring to? What do you mean by "squelched"? Is
there a post of yours that has not made it to the list yet? I can have
the admin check the queue for me
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Colin J. Williams
wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 7:20 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Doug Coleman wrote:
>
>>
>> Also, gmail "bottom-posts" by default. It's transparent to gmail users.
>> I'd imagine they are some of the biggest offenders.
>>
On 11/04/2013 7:20 PM, Paul Hobson
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Doug Coleman
wrote:
Also, gmail "bottom-posts" by default. It
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Doug Coleman wrote:
>
> Also, gmail "bottom-posts" by default. It's transparent to gmail users.
> I'd imagine they are some of the biggest offenders.
>
Interesting. Mine go to the top by default and I always have to expand the
quoted text, trim down as necessary,
Chris Barker - NOAA Federal, on 2013-04-04 09:01, wrote:
> Which is why I advocate interspersed posting.
This. (with heavy snipping).
... But I just came across a wonderfully short signature from
Rick Moen, and thought I'd pass it along:
Cheers, A: Yes.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <
chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote:
[...]
> Which is why I advocate interspersed posting.
>
> It comes down to: please take some thought to compose your post in a
> way that is suited to the thread and what you are writing, rather than
> simp
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> With top-posting I'm forced to write "With respect to what you write
> about the GIL issues, ...". Bleh. In fact, in deep technical threads
> it's very difficult for me to write top-posting at all, which is why I
> get so irritated whe
On 04/04/2013 12:00 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
> OK, OK, I know the fashion is to blast people with "please don't top
> post" messages -- it seems to have invaded all the mailing lists I'm
> on.
>
> But I don't get it.
>
> Most of us have threaded mail readers these days, so is it so ha
On 04/03/2013 08:06 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
Nice editing! ;)
Steve
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
What's the problem? ;)
Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Doug Coleman wrote:
> Also, gmail "bottom-posts" by default. It's transparent to gmail users. I'd
> imagine they are some of the biggest offenders.
Not with my configuration -- which I don't hink I changed -- it's top
posting by default for me.
however, gmail doe
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Doug Coleman wrote:
> I swear by a mouse with an unlockable scroll wheel. Scroll to your heart's
> content!
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-G500-Programmable-Gaming-Mouse/dp/B002J9GDXI
>
>
> Also, gmail "bottom-posts" by default. It's transparent to gmail users.
I swear by a mouse with an unlockable scroll wheel. Scroll to your heart's
content!
http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-G500-Programmable-Gaming-Mouse/dp/B002J9GDXI
Also, gmail "bottom-posts" by default. It's transparent to gmail users. I'd
imagine they are some of the biggest offenders.
Doug
_
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
> wrote:
>> Best of all is intelligent editing of the thread so far
...
> Traditionally this is what the phrase "bottom posting" meant, as a
> term of art, and is the key reason w
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
wrote:
> Best of all is intelligent editing of the thread so far -- edit it
> down to the key points you are commenting on, and intersperse your
> comments. That way your email stands on its own as meaningful, but
> there is not a big pi
OK, OK, I know the fashion is to blast people with "please don't top
post" messages -- it seems to have invaded all the mailing lists I'm
on.
But I don't get it.
Most of us have threaded mail readers these days, so is it so hard to
follow a thread?
Maybe I'm a weirdo, but it is FAR more common f
20 matches
Mail list logo