Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please keep Numpy master working on Py3

2011-02-03 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:09 PM, David wrote: > >> On 02/02/2011 02:57 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:49 PM, David > > > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > In the meantime, I put the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please keep Numpy master working on Py3

2011-02-03 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:09 PM, David wrote: > On 02/02/2011 02:57 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:49 PM, David > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, I put the relevant header in > > numpy/core/src/private, to > > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please keep Numpy master working on Py3

2011-02-01 Thread David
On 02/02/2011 02:57 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:49 PM, David > wrote: > > > > > > In the meantime, I put the relevant header in > numpy/core/src/private, to > > make the dependency clearer. > > Following that argument, there

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please keep Numpy master working on Py3

2011-02-01 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:49 PM, David wrote: > > > In the meantime, I put the relevant header in numpy/core/src/private, to > > make the dependency clearer. > > Following that argument, there are other unwanted dependencies between > multiarray and ufunc, causing circular dependencies. I don't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please keep Numpy master working on Py3

2011-02-01 Thread David
On 02/02/2011 01:53 PM, David wrote: > On 02/02/2011 08:58 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The master branch did not build today on Python 3. Please make sure that >> your code works correctly also on Python 3, before pushing it. >> >> *** >> >> I mostly fixed the stuff for now, mostly

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please keep Numpy master working on Py3

2011-02-01 Thread David
On 02/02/2011 08:58 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Hi, > > The master branch did not build today on Python 3. Please make sure that > your code works correctly also on Python 3, before pushing it. > > *** > > I mostly fixed the stuff for now, mostly just the usual bytes vs unicode. > > On Python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please keep Numpy master working on Py3

2011-02-01 Thread Pauli Virtanen
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:42:04 -0800, Mark Wiebe wrote: [clip] > Sorry about that, I had hoped to be able to use the build-bot to > test/diagnose the issues, but it's down and I didn't pursue it further. Hmm, I see Github's SVN gateway is broken again. Perhaps it could be possible to make it work d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please keep Numpy master working on Py3

2011-02-01 Thread Pauli Virtanen
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:42:04 -0800, Mark Wiebe wrote: [clip: problem 1] > This looks like it's a problem in new_iterator_pywrap.c, in > PySequenceMethods npyiter_as_sequence. I got this error when trying to > slice before implementing the slot sq_slice. I copied the definition > from array_as_seq

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please keep Numpy master working on Py3

2011-02-01 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Hi, > > The master branch did not build today on Python 3. Please make sure that > your code works correctly also on Python 3, before pushing it. > Sorry about that, I had hoped to be able to use the build-bot to test/diagnose the issues, b

[Numpy-discussion] Please keep Numpy master working on Py3

2011-02-01 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Hi, The master branch did not build today on Python 3. Please make sure that your code works correctly also on Python 3, before pushing it. *** I mostly fixed the stuff for now, mostly just the usual bytes vs unicode. On Python 3, the tests however give two non-obvious failures -- I'm not