Pierre GM wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>> Well, I guess I hit send too soon. Here's one easy solution
>> (consistent with
>> what you did for __radd__), change the code for __rmul__ to do:
>>
>> return multiply(self, other)
>>
>> instead of:
>>
>> return multipl
On Feb 3, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>
> Well, I guess I hit send too soon. Here's one easy solution
> (consistent with
> what you did for __radd__), change the code for __rmul__ to do:
>
> return multiply(self, other)
>
> instead of:
>
> return multiply(other, self)
>
> That
Ryan May wrote:
> Pierre,
>
> I know you did some preliminary work on helping to make sure that doing
> operations on masked arrays doesn't change the underlying data. I ran into
> the
> following today.
>
> import numpy as np
> a = np.ma.array([1,2,3], mask=[False, True, False])
> b = a * 10
>
Pierre,
I know you did some preliminary work on helping to make sure that doing
operations on masked arrays doesn't change the underlying data. I ran into the
following today.
import numpy as np
a = np.ma.array([1,2,3], mask=[False, True, False])
b = a * 10
c = 10 * a
print b.data # Prints [10 2
