Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > NumPy 1.7 is due out in the next few weeks. This depends on whether all the issues regarding the move to gcc 4.x on Windows will be solved. Right now numpy is not releasable. Either those issues get solved, or we have to do something abou

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

NumPy 1.7 is due out in the next few weeks. This will obviously support 2.4. It can be used for as long as people want. Right now, there is a plan for NumPy 1.8 to be released in the summer which will have much attention paid to it in order to improve the documentation, add bug-fixes, as w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:08 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > As Bruce said, 29 Feb 2012 and not 2014: > > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ > > I think Bruce and me were not talking about the same RHEL version

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > As Bruce said, 29 Feb 2012 and not 2014: > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ I think Bruce and me were not talking about the same RHEL version (4 vs 5). Let me see if I can set up a buildbot for 2.4. David ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:05 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Ralf Gommers < > ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, David Cournapeau > >> wro

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, David Cournapeau >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Ralf Gommers >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:3

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Travis Oliphant >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I think supporting Python 2.5 and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: > >> > >> I think supporting Python 2.5 and above is completely fine. I'd even be > >> in favor of bumping up to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On 5 February 2012 07:19, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: >> >> I think supporting Python 2.5 and above is completely fine.  I'd even be >> in favor of bumping up to Python 2.6 for NumPy 1.7 and certainly for NumPy >> 2.8 >> > +1 for dropping Pytho

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: >> >> I think supporting Python 2.5 and above is completely fine.  I'd even be >> in favor of bumping up to Python 2.6 for NumPy 1.7 and certainly for NumPy >> 2.8 >> > +1 for dropping

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > I think supporting Python 2.5 and above is completely fine. I'd even be > in favor of bumping up to Python 2.6 for NumPy 1.7 and certainly for NumPy > 2.8 > > +1 for dropping Python 2.5 support also for an LTS release. That will make it a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

I think supporting Python 2.5 and above is completely fine. I'd even be in favor of bumping up to Python 2.6 for NumPy 1.7 and certainly for NumPy 2.8 -Travis On Feb 4, 2012, at 10:13 PM, Bruce Southey wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, Feb

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: >> >> We are spending a lot of time on NumPy and will be for the next few >> months.  I think that 1.8 will be a better long term release.  We need a few >> more fundamental featur

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > We are spending a lot of time on NumPy and will be for the next few > months. I think that 1.8 will be a better long term release. We need a > few more fundamental features yet. > > Look for a roadmap document for discussion from Mark Wie

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

We are spending a lot of time on NumPy and will be for the next few months. I think that 1.8 will be a better long term release. We need a few more fundamental features yet. Look for a roadmap document for discussion from Mark Wiebe and I within the week about NumPy 1.8 which has a target r

[Numpy-discussion] On making Numpy 1.7 a long term support release.

Hi All, In the discussion on deprecating old macros in 1.7 as part of pull request 189 the issue of how to move numpy forward and start clearing the decks of accumulated cruft arose. The proposal here is to make the 1.7 a long term support release that we