Hi,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:51 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, David Cournapeau
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On Sun
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun,
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Brett
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Brett
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
>
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Matthew Brett
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Matthew Brett >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Matthew Brett <
> matthew.br...@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sorry for my continued confusion here. This is numpy 1.6.1 on windows
>> > XP
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry for my continued confusion here. This is numpy 1.6.1 on windows
> > XP 32 bit.
> >
> > In [2]: np.finfo(np.float96).nmant
> > Out[2]: 52
> >
> > In [3]:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for my continued confusion here. This is numpy 1.6.1 on windows
> XP 32 bit.
>
> In [2]: np.finfo(np.float96).nmant
> Out[2]: 52
>
> In [3]: np.finfo(np.float96).nexp
> Out[3]: 15
>
> In [4]: np.finfo(np.float64).nmant
>
Hi,
Sorry for my continued confusion here. This is numpy 1.6.1 on windows
XP 32 bit.
In [2]: np.finfo(np.float96).nmant
Out[2]: 52
In [3]: np.finfo(np.float96).nexp
Out[3]: 15
In [4]: np.finfo(np.float64).nmant
Out[4]: 52
In [5]: np.finfo(np.float64).nexp
Out[5]: 11
If there are 52 bits of p
12 matches
Mail list logo