On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> I don't like that approach, closing PRs with valuable code causes them
> to get lost in the much larger set of closed ones.
> Instead we could tag them appropriately so they can be found by
> parties interested in using or finishing them. The
I don't like that approach, closing PRs with valuable code causes them
to get lost in the much larger set of closed ones.
Instead we could tag them appropriately so they can be found by
parties interested in using or finishing them. These could also be used
for new contributors to work on.
You coul
FYI also useful to simply close by time - say older than 6 months with a
message for the writer to reopen if they want to work on it
then u don't get too many stale ones
my 2c
> On Jan 31, 2016, at 2:10 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> There are now 130 open numpy pull request
Hi All,
There are now 130 open numpy pull requests and it seems almost impossible
to keep that number down. My personal decision is that I am going to ignore
any new enhancements for the next couple of months and only merge bug
fixes, tests, house keeping (style, docs, deprecations), and old PRs.
