Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Positional Array

2009-03-31 Thread Ian Mallett
Same. Thanks, too. ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Positional Array

2009-03-31 Thread Partridge, Matthew BGI SYD
> The array follows a pattern: each array of length 2 represents the x,y index of that array within the larger array. Is this what you are after? >>> numpy.array(list(numpy.ndindex(n,n))).reshape(n,n,2) -- This message and any attachments are confidential, proprietary, and may be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Positional Array

2009-03-31 Thread Ian Mallett
Thanks! ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Positional Array

2009-03-31 Thread Robert Kern
2009/3/31 Ian Mallett : > The array follows a pattern: each array of length 2 represents the x,y index > of that array within the larger array. Ah, right. Use dstack(mgrid[0:n,0:n]). -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terribl

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Positional Array

2009-03-31 Thread Ian Mallett
The array follows a pattern: each array of length 2 represents the x,y index of that array within the larger array. ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Positional Array

2009-03-31 Thread Robert Kern
2009/3/31 Ian Mallett : > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Robert Kern wrote: >> >> How do you want to fill in the array? If you are typing it in >> literally into your code, you would do basically the above, without >> the ...'s, and wrap it in numpy.array(...). > > I know that, but in some cases

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Positional Array

2009-03-31 Thread Ian Mallett
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > How do you want to fill in the array? If you are typing it in > literally into your code, you would do basically the above, without > the ...'s, and wrap it in numpy.array(...). I know that, but in some cases, n will be quite large, perhaps 1

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Positional Array

2009-03-31 Thread Robert Kern
2009/3/31 Ian Mallett : > Hello, > I'm trying to make an array of size n*n*2.  It should be of the form: > [[[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[3,0],[4,0], ... ,[n,0]], >  [[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[3,1],[4,1], ... ,[n,1]], >  [[0,2],[1,2],[2,2],[3,2],[4,2], ... ,[n,2]], >  [[0,3],[1,3],[2,3],[3,3],[4,3], ... ,[n,3]], >

[Numpy-discussion] Numpy Positional Array

2009-03-31 Thread Ian Mallett
Hello, I'm trying to make an array of size n*n*2. It should be of the form: [[[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[3,0],[4,0], ... ,[n,0]], [[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[3,1],[4,1], ... ,[n,1]], [[0,2],[1,2],[2,2],[3,2],[4,2], ... ,[n,2]], [[0,3],[1,3],[2,3],[3,3],[4,3], ... ,[n,3]], [[0,4],[1,4],[2,4],[3,4],[4,4], ... ,