On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> > that the main thing missing at this point is fixing the datetime
> problems.
>
> What needs to be done, and what is the plan forward?
>
I'm not sure that's quite been decided, but my take:
1) remove the existing time zone handling -
On 9 Nov 2013 03:22, "Charles R Harris" wrote:
>
> that the main thing missing at this point is fixing the datetime problems.
What needs to be done, and what is the plan forward? Is there perhaps an
issue one can follow?
Thanks
Stéfan
___
NumPy-Discuss
Ralf Gommers gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Charles R Harris
gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> and think that the main thing missing at this point is fixing the datetime
problems.
>
>
> Is anyone planning to work on this? If yes, you need a rough estimate of
when this is r
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The question has come up as to how much effort we should spend backporting
> fixes to 1.8.x. An alternative would be to tag 1.9.0 early next year,
> aiming for a release around April. I think there is almost enough in
> 1.9-deve
Hi All,
The question has come up as to how much effort we should spend backporting
fixes to 1.8.x. An alternative would be to tag 1.9.0 early next year,
aiming for a release around April. I think there is almost enough in
1.9-devel to justify a release. There is Sebastian's index work, Julian's
co
