On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 29/03/14 00:05, Julian Taylor wrote:
>
>> But the library is still installed in the system (at least on the 10.9
>> macs I saw)
>>
>
> I only find it in the gfortran 4.8 I installed separately. Nowhere else.
Have a look at the README for
On 29/03/14 00:05, Julian Taylor wrote:
> But the library is still installed in the system (at least on the 10.9
> macs I saw)
>
I only find it in the gfortran 4.8 I installed separately. Nowhere else.
Sturla
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Di
Olivier Grisel wrote:
> Would it be possible to use a static
> gcc toolchain as Carl Kleffner is using for his experimental windows
> whl packages?
I think we should consider to device a Fortran to C99 translator.
Sturla
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing
On 29.03.2014 00:02, Sturla Molden wrote:
> Julian Taylor wrote:
>> On 28.03.2014 23:09, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>
>> you can get rid of libgfortran and quadmath with the -static-libgfortran
>> flag
>> libgcc_s is probably more tricky as scipy uses c++ so -static-libgcc may
>> need checking before
Julian Taylor wrote:
> On 28.03.2014 23:09, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> you can get rid of libgfortran and quadmath with the -static-libgfortran
> flag
> libgcc_s is probably more tricky as scipy uses c++ so -static-libgcc may
> need checking before using it
> doesn't mac provide libgcc_s anyway? Eve
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
>> On 3/22/2014 7:28 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > It is time for the 1.8.1 release to go forward. I'm on the fence as to
>> > whether to do an rc2 or just
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> On 3/22/2014 7:28 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It is time for the 1.8.1 release to go forward. I'm on the fence as to
> > whether to do an rc2 or just release and do a 1.8.2 if needed. The
> > problems noted with the 1.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> On 3/22/2014 7:28 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It is time for the 1.8.1 release to go forward. I'm on the fence as to
> > whether to do an rc2 or just release and do a 1.8.2 if needed. The
> > problems noted with the 1
On 3/22/2014 7:28 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It is time for the 1.8.1 release to go forward. I'm on the fence as to
> whether to do an rc2 or just release and do a 1.8.2 if needed. The
> problems noted with the 1.8.1rc1 should be fixed, but if you are in a
> position to test the curr
Hi All,
It is time for the 1.8.1 release to go forward. I'm on the fence as to
whether to do an rc2 or just release and do a 1.8.2 if needed. The problems
noted with the 1.8.1rc1 should be fixed, but if you are in a position to
test the current 1.8.x branch, please give it a try.
Chuck
__
10 matches
Mail list logo
