rex wrote:
>
> I tried Debian a couple of years ago and the Devil I know (somewhat)
> seemed a better choice. Perhaps I should try again.
Debian installer improved a lot the last few years. Otherwise, try
Ubuntu, which is easier to install than mac os x on supported hardware
(I am not kidding). B
David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-09 06:35]:
> rex wrote:
> >
> > I've been using SUSE since version
> > 6.4, and it's always a battle to get Numpy/SciPy running.
>
> This is really Suse fault, honnestly. As Fedora, they have mostly broken
> blas or lapack, or at least had for a long
rex wrote:
>
> Thanks for the response. Numpy/SciPy has always been one of the most
> difficult packages to install I've ever encountered (I've installed
> hundreds of tarballs over the years). I've been using SUSE since version
> 6.4, and it's always a battle to get Numpy/SciPy running. I succeed
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 01:19:41AM -0700, rex wrote:
> Thanks for the response. Numpy/SciPy has always been one of the most
> difficult packages to install I've ever encountered (I've installed
> hundreds of tarballs over the years). I've been using SUSE since version
> 6.4, and it's always a battl
David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-08 22:49]:
> rex wrote:
> > I don't know if this is the appropriate place for this, but thanks for
> > any pointers to what the problem is.
> >
> > -rex
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "", line 1, in
> > File "/usr/lib/python2.5
rex wrote:
> I don't know if this is the appropriate place for this, but thanks for
> any pointers to what the problem is.
>
> -rex
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/__init__.py", line 43, in
>
> import linalg
>
I don't know if this is the appropriate place for this, but thanks for
any pointers to what the problem is.
-rex
deserv:/ # smart install python-numpy
Loading cache...
Updating cache...
## [100%]
Computing transact
