On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 16:52, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Specifically, what changes are you thinking of making?
>> numpy.test(coverage=True) already triggers nose's coverage feature.
>
> Actually, that wasn'
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Specifically, what changes are you thinking of making?
> numpy.test(coverage=True) already triggers nose's coverage feature.
Actually, that wasn't supposed to get added in my last checkin; I was
experimenting with it and for
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 16:35, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Nose has a plugin (included in the current version of nose) that uses
> Ned Batchelder's coverage module
> (http://nedbatchelder.com/code/modules/coverage.html) to provide
> coverage information. Is it acceptable
Hi all,
Nose has a plugin (included in the current version of nose) that uses
Ned Batchelder's coverage module
(http://nedbatchelder.com/code/modules/coverage.html) to provide
coverage information. Is it acceptable to use this capability in nose
to provide coverage reporting for NumPy? The cover
