On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Matthieu Rigal wrote:
> In fact, I was hoping to have a less memory and more speed solution.
which do often go together, at least for big problems -- pushingm
emory around often takes more time than the computation itself.
> At the end, I am rather interested by
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your answer and the related help !
In fact, I was hoping to have a less memory and more speed solution. Something
equivalent to a "raster calculator" for numpy. Wouldn't it make sense to have
some optimized function to work on more than 2 arrays for numpy anyway ?
At the
