Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Sebastian Berg
On So, 2015-04-05 at 07:08 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Sebastian Berg > wrote: > On Fr, 2015-04-03 at 21:00 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > > > Just to raise the question if these two options shou

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Fr, 2015-04-03 at 21:00 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > > > Just to raise the question if these two options should be removed at > > some point? The current default value for both is 0, so we have > > separate compilati

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Apr 5, 2015 3:09 AM, "David Cournapeau" wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >> IIRC there allegedly exist platforms where separate compilation doesn't work right? I'm happy to get rid of it if no one speaks up to defend such platforms, though, we can always add

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Fr, 2015-04-03 at 21:00 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > > Just to raise the question if these two options should be removed at > some point? The current default value for both is 0, so we have > separate compilation and relaxed strides checking by default. > I still have some sm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > IIRC there allegedly exist platforms where separate compilation doesn't > work right? I'm happy to get rid of it if no one speaks up to defend such > platforms, though, we can always add it back later. One case was for > statically linking

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-03 Thread Nathaniel Smith
IIRC there allegedly exist platforms where separate compilation doesn't work right? I'm happy to get rid of it if no one speaks up to defend such platforms, though, we can always add it back later. One case was for statically linking numpy into the interpreter, but I'm skeptical about how much we s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-03 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Just to raise the question if these two options should be removed at some > point? The current default value for both is 0, so we have separate > compilation and relaxed strides checking by default. > > Oops, default value is 1

[Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-03 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Just to raise the question if these two options should be removed at some point? The current default value for both is 0, so we have separate compilation and relaxed strides checking by default. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Disc