Wow, that's a very cool idea. I think that's an excellent approach to
allowing user RPython functions. Maciej expressed concern this could create
a support burden for RPython for the core PyPy developers (There aren't many
of them). I think, handled correctly, this could help create a community
k
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <
da...@student.matnat.uio.no> wrote:
> Dan Roberts wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply. You're certainly right that your work is
> > extremely beneficial to mine. At present I'm afraid a great deal of
> > NumPy C code isn't easily reusable and i
Dan Roberts wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. You're certainly right that your work is
> extremely beneficial to mine. At present I'm afraid a great deal of
> NumPy C code isn't easily reusable and it's great you're addressing
> that. I may not have been thinking in line with Maciej, but I was
Oops, I intended to dig more through the NumPy source before I sent the
final version of that message, so I could be speaking from an informed
standpoint.
Thanks,
Daniel Roberts
>
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discuss...
--
Travis O
Thanks for the reply. You're certainly right that your work is extremely
beneficial to mine. At present I'm afraid a great deal of NumPy C code
isn't easily reusable and it's great you're addressing that. I may not have
been thinking in line with Maciej, but I was thinking ufuncs would be
writte
On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Dan Roberts wrote:
Hello NumPy Users,
Hi everybody, my name is Dan Roberts, and my Google Summer of
Code proposal was categorized under NumPy rather than PyPy, so it
will end up being reviewed by mentors for the NumPy project. I'd
like to take this chanc
Dan Roberts wrote:
> Hi everybody, my name is Dan Roberts, and my Google Summer of Code
cool stuff.
A few years back, someone did a tiny micro-prototype of numpy
implemented in Psyco, using the array.array data type as the base. It
was actually pretty promising performance-wise. I don't kn
On Apr 18, 2010 6:46 PM, "Dan Roberts" wrote:
I've been trying my best to take my time formulating my replies but I need
to respond eventually. :-)
This is embarassing, but I'm actually not sure where I talked about an
interface specifically. I did rather nebulously talk about interfacing w
su, 2010-04-18 kello 19:05 +0900, David Cournapeau kirjoitti:
[clip]
> First, an aside: with the recent announcement from pypy concerning the
> new way of interfacing with C, wouldn't it make more sense to go the
> other way around - i.e. starting from full numpy, and replace some
> parts in rpyth
Hi Dan,
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Dan Roberts wrote:
> Hello NumPy Users,
> Hi everybody, my name is Dan Roberts, and my Google Summer of Code
> proposal was categorized under NumPy rather than PyPy, so it will end up
> being reviewed by mentors for the NumPy project. I'd like to take
Hi Dan
On 17 April 2010 06:50, Dan Roberts wrote:
> Hi everybody, my name is Dan Roberts, and my Google Summer of Code
> proposal was categorized under NumPy rather than PyPy, so it will end up
> being reviewed by mentors for the NumPy project. I'd like to take this
> chance to introduce mys
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> Dan Roberts wrote:
>> Hello NumPy Users,
>> Hi everybody, my name is Dan Roberts, and my Google Summer of Code
>> proposal was categorized under NumPy rather than PyPy, so it will end up
>> being reviewed by mentors for the NumPy project. I'd like to take this
Dan Roberts wrote:
> Hello NumPy Users,
> Hi everybody, my name is Dan Roberts, and my Google Summer of Code
> proposal was categorized under NumPy rather than PyPy, so it will end up
> being reviewed by mentors for the NumPy project. I'd like to take this
> chance to introduce myself and m
Hello NumPy Users,
Hi everybody, my name is Dan Roberts, and my Google Summer of Code
proposal was categorized under NumPy rather than PyPy, so it will end up
being reviewed by mentors for the NumPy project. I'd like to take this
chance to introduce myself and my proposal.
I hadn't prepare
14 matches
Mail list logo
