Hi All,
On 08/02/13 00:57, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
>> ...
>> Maybe you can check that article to find more case to compare.
>
> Yes, I know about this article --- I've been in touch with Sylwester about it,
> as I found his code on github a
Hi Ondřej,
Any ideas that your manual syntax mapping would evolve to an automatic
translation tool like i2py [http://code.google.com/p/i2py/]
Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recently setup a page about modern Fortran:
>
> http://fortran90.org/
>
>
Thanks for providing this. Reference is excellent, especially as I was
collecting Fortran and f2py resources, some month ago, and I found nothing
similar to answers you expose.
Side by side syntax is just great and intuitive
And rest is...
Thanks
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ondřej Čertík wr
Frédéric,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just read a paper[1] that compare python with numpy or pypy vs c++ and
> fortran from a code, memory and speed point of view. The python code was
> still better as you can't have list of ndarray in fortran and some oth
Hi,
I just read a paper[1] that compare python with numpy or pypy vs c++ and
fortran from a code, memory and speed point of view. The python code was
still better as you can't have list of ndarray in fortran and some other
stuff was harder to do. The fastest was fortran, then C++, but pypy around
Hi,
I have recently setup a page about modern Fortran:
http://fortran90.org/
and in particular, it has a long section with side by side syntax
examples of Python/NumPy vs Fortran:
http://fortran90.org/src/rosetta.html
I would be very interested if some NumPy gurus would provide me
feedback. I
