Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of generalised ufuncs branch

2008-10-07 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The generalised ufuncs branch was made available before SciPy'08. We >> solicited comments on its implementation and st

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of generalised ufuncs branch

2008-10-07 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi all, > > The generalised ufuncs branch was made available before SciPy'08. We > solicited comments on its implementation and structuring, but received > very little feedback. Unless there are any further comments

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of generalised ufuncs branch

2008-10-07 Thread Anne Archibald
2008/10/7 Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The generalised ufuncs branch was made available before SciPy'08. We > solicited comments on its implementation and structuring, but received > very little feedback. Unless there are any further comments from the > community, I propose that we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of generalised ufuncs branch

2008-10-07 Thread Jarrod Millman
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The generalised ufuncs branch was made available before SciPy'08. We > solicited comments on its implementation and structuring, but received > very little feedback. Unless there are any further comments from the >

[Numpy-discussion] Merge of generalised ufuncs branch

2008-10-07 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
Hi all, The generalised ufuncs branch was made available before SciPy'08. We solicited comments on its implementation and structuring, but received very little feedback. Unless there are any further comments from the community, I propose that we merge it. It is unfortunate that we have so many