Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of date-time branch completed

2009-08-28 Thread Travis Oliphant
On Aug 28, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: On Aug 28, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: Hello folks, In keeping with the complaint that the pace of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of date-time branch completed

2009-08-28 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > On Aug 28, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: > >> >> Hello folks, >> >> In keeping with the complaint that the pace of NumPy development is too >> fast, I've fi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of date-time branch completed

2009-08-28 Thread Travis Oliphant
On Aug 28, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: Hello folks, In keeping with the complaint that the pace of NumPy development is too fast, I've finished the merge of the datetime branch to the core. The trunk builds and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of date-time branch completed

2009-08-28 Thread Robert Kern
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:39, Charles R Harris wrote: > What does UFUNC_OBJ_NEEDS_API do? It specifies that the ufunc loops need access to the Python C API, so the dispatcher should not release the GIL before running the loop. > Hmm, "can also have an additional key called "metadata" which can

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of date-time branch completed

2009-08-28 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > Hello folks, > > In keeping with the complaint that the pace of NumPy development is too fast, > I've finished the merge of the datetime branch to the core. The trunk builds > and all the (previous) tests pass for me. > > There are se

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of date-time branch completed

2009-08-28 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > In keeping with the complaint that the pace of NumPy development is too fast, > I've finished the merge of the datetime branch to the core. The trunk buil

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Merge of date-time branch completed

2009-08-28 Thread Darren Dale
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > Hello folks, > In keeping with the complaint that the pace of NumPy development is too fast, I've finished the merge of the datetime branch to the core.  The trunk builds and all the (previous) tests pass for me. > There are several tasks

[Numpy-discussion] Merge of date-time branch completed

2009-08-28 Thread Travis Oliphant
Hello folks, In keeping with the complaint that the pace of NumPy development is too fast, I've finished the merge of the datetime branch to the core. The trunk builds and all the (previous) tests pass for me. There are several tasks remaining to be done (the current status is definitel