On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:45:57PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
> > If it would be desireable, I could try to find time for a patch. I could
> > use this in my work, and if I am going to implement it, I might as well
> > do it for everybody.
> load() would need to grow a mode= keyword argument to pro
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 14:30, Gael Varoquaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:27:54PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
>> > If yes why isn't it exposed in numpy.load? If not, the questions
>> > above apply.
>
>> I have no idea. I didn't write that code.
>
> Robert, you know these t
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:27:54PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
> > If yes why isn't it exposed in numpy.load? If not, the questions
> > above apply.
> I have no idea. I didn't write that code.
Robert, you know these things way better than me, so please pardon my
stupid question:
Would it be desi
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 14:25, Gael Varoquaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>> Currently memmapping a .npy file is not implemented. Is there a reason
>> than lack of time for this? Are there any major difficulties?
>
> Actually, let me
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> Currently memmapping a .npy file is not implemented. Is there a reason
> than lack of time for this? Are there any major difficulties?
Actually, let me rephrase this question to be more clear:
Is the functionnality needed in the nu
Currently memmapping a .npy file is not implemented. Is there a reason
than lack of time for this? Are there any major difficulties?
Cheers,
Gaël
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/num
