well, it sounded like a good idea.
Oh, well.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 16:24, Chris Colbert wrote:
> > How about just introducing a slightly different syntax which tells numpy
> to
> > handle the array like a matrix:
> >
> > Some thing along
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 16:24, Chris Colbert wrote:
> How about just introducing a slightly different syntax which tells numpy to
> handle the array like a matrix:
>
> Some thing along the lines of this:
>
> A = array[[..]]
> B = array[[..]]
>
> elementwise multipication (as it currently is):
>
> C
How about just introducing a slightly different syntax which tells numpy to
handle the array like a matrix:
Some thing along the lines of this:
A = array[[..]]
B = array[[..]]
elementwise multipication (as it currently is):
C = A * B
matrix multiplication:
C = {A} * {B}
or
C = [A] * [B]
or
On 6/5/2009 3:49 PM Stéfan van der Walt apparently wrote:
> If the Matrix class is to remain, we need to take the steps
> necessary to integrate it into NumPy properly.
I think this requires a list of current problems.
Many of the problems for NumPy have been addressed over time.
I believe the rem
Hi Alan
2009/6/5 Alan G Isaac :
> You should take it very seriously when someone
> reports to you that the matrix object is a crucial to them,
> e.g., as a teaching tool. Even if you do not find
> personally persuasive an example like
> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2009-June/0
