On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> On 3/12/2014 6:04 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4351
>
> The Semantics section still begins with 0d, then 2d, then 1d, then nd.
> Given the context of the proposal, the order should be:
>
> 2d (the core n
On 3/12/2014 6:04 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4351
The Semantics section still begins with 0d, then 2d, then 1d, then nd.
Given the context of the proposal, the order should be:
2d (the core need expressed in the proposal)
nd (which generalizes via broadca
Hi all,
The proposal to add an infix operator to Python for matrix
multiplication is nearly ready for its debut on python-ideas; so if
you want to look it over first, just want to check out where it's
gone, then now's a good time:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4351
The basic idea here is
