On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Sebastian Walter wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Ermm, the reply above is quite poor, sorry about that.
>> > What I meant to say is the following:
>> >
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:32 PM, James Bergstra
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:08 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> could be put out of multiarray proper. Also, exposing an API for
>> things like fancy indexing would be very useful, but I don't know if
>> it even makes sense - I think a pure pyth
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:08 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> could be put out of multiarray proper. Also, exposing an API for
> things like fancy indexing would be very useful, but I don't know if
> it even makes sense - I think a pure python implementation of fancy
> indexing as a reference would be
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Sebastian Walter wrote:
>
> >
> > Ermm, the reply above is quite poor, sorry about that.
> > What I meant to say is the following:
> >
> > If there is going to be a discussion about creating a pure C numpy
> >
On Apr 11, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Sebastian Walter wrote:
>
> Ermm, the reply above is quite poor, sorry about that.
> What I meant to say is the following:
>
> If there is going to be a discussion about creating a pure C numpy
> library I'd like to join ;)
Great. I would really like to get the dis
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Sebastian Walter
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:08 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>
>> Hi Travis,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Travis Oliphant
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I should have some time over t
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:08 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
> Hi Travis,
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
>
>
> I should have some time over the next couple of weeks, and I am very
>
> interested in refactoring the N
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:08 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi Travis,
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Travis Oliphant > wrote:
I should have some time over the next couple of weeks, and I am very
interested in refactoring the NumPy code to separate out the Python
interface layer from the "library"
Hi Travis,
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
>
> I should have some time over the next couple of weeks, and I am very
> interested in refactoring the NumPy code to separate out the Python
> interface layer from the "library" layer as much as possible. I had
> some discuss
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 05:43:41PM -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I should have some time over the next couple of weeks, and I am very
> interested in refactoring the NumPy code to separate out the Python
> interface layer from the "library" layer as much as possible. I had
> some discussi
On Apr 5, 2010, at 12:10 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, but there isn't much low level stuff there and I don't want
>> to toss a
>> lot of real numerical code into it.
>
> I don't understand: there is already math cod
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:10 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, but there isn't much low level stuff there and I don't want to toss
> a
> > lot of real numerical code into it.
>
> I don't understand: there is already mat
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:11, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>>
>
> Yeah, but there isn't much low level stuff there and I don't want to toss a
> lot of real numerical code into it.
I don't understand: there is already math code there, and you cannot
be much more low level than what's there (there
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:11, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Kern
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Ha
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:11, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Kern
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:11, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Robert Kern
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Robert Kern
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > David Cournapeau has
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy math
>> > library that would supp
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy math
> > library that would supply missing functions and I'm wondering how we
> should
> > organise t
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy math
> library that would supply missing functions and I'm wondering how we should
> organise the source code. Should we put a mathlib directory in
> numpy/core/s
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy math
> library that would supply missing functions and I'm wondering how we should
> organise the source code. Should we put a mathlib directory in
> numpy/core/src
Hi All,
David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy math
library that would supply missing functions and I'm wondering how we should
organise the source code. Should we put a mathlib directory in
numpy/core/src? Inside that directory would be functions for
single/double/exten
23 matches
Mail list logo
