Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-11 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > That is one of my concerns about the "bit pattern" idea -- we've then > created a new binary type that no other standard software understands > -- that looks like a a lot of work to me to deal with, or even worse, > ripe for weird, non-obvious

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn < d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no> wrote: > On 05/10/2012 08:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > > wrote: > >> What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified "double*". > > > >> all I want is my

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/10/2012 08:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > wrote: >> What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified "double*". > >> all I want is my glorified >> "double*". I'm probably not a representative user.) > > Actually, I think you are represent

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Travis Oliphant
On May 10, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > wrote: >> What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified "double*". > >> all I want is my glorified >> "double*". I'm probably not a representative user.) > > Actually, I think you are r

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Scott Ransom wrote: > >> On 05/10/2012 02:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote: >> > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >> > wrote: >> >> What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified "do

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Scott Ransom wrote: > On 05/10/2012 02:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > > wrote: > >> What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified "double*". > > > >> all I want is my glorified > >> "double*". I'm probab

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Inati, Souheil (NIH/NIMH) [E]
On May 10, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > wrote: >> What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified "double*". > >> all I want is my glorified >> "double*". I'm probably not a representative user.) > > Actually, I think you are r

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Scott Ransom
On 05/10/2012 02:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > wrote: >> What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified "double*". > >> all I want is my glorified >> "double*". I'm probably not a representative user.) > > Actually, I think you are represent

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Barker
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified "double*". > all I want is my glorified > "double*". I'm probably not a representative user.) Actually, I think you are representative of a LOT of users -- it turns, out, whether Jim Hu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/10/2012 11:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 05/10/2012 10:40 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >> mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no>> wrote: >> >> On 05/10/2012 06:18 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> > >> > >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/10/2012 11:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 05/10/2012 10:40 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >> mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no>> wrote: >> >> On 05/10/2012 06:18 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> > >> > >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/10/2012 10:40 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no>> wrote: > > On 05/10/2012 06:18 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > > m

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn < d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no> wrote: > On 05/10/2012 06:18 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > > mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no>> wrote: > > > > Sorry everyone for being so dense

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-10 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/10/2012 06:18 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no>> wrote: > > Sorry everyone for being so dense and contaminating that other thread. > Here's a new thread where I can respond to Nathaniel's respons

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-09 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn < d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no> wrote: > Sorry everyone for being so dense and contaminating that other thread. > Here's a new thread where I can respond to Nathaniel's response. > > On 05/10/2012 01:08 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > Hi Dag, > >

[Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays

2012-05-09 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Sorry everyone for being so dense and contaminating that other thread. Here's a new thread where I can respond to Nathaniel's response. On 05/10/2012 01:08 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Hi Dag, > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > wrote: >> I'm a heavy user of masks, w