Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

On Monday 27 August 2007 14:09:33 Christopher Barker wrote: > This is the best bet, or we could call the new one ma, and the old one > ma_old. In any case, the old one needs to stick around until the new one > has been fully tested for compatibility (and otherwise). That shouldn't be a pb, the te

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

Matt Knox wrote: > - put it in numpy as a separate module from numpy.ma initially? > (eg. "numpy.ma_new" ?) This is the best bet, or we could call the new one ma, and the old one ma_old. In any case, the old one needs to stick around until the new one has been fully tested for compatibility (a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

Pierre GM wrote: > * Does anyone see any *disadvantages* to this aspect of maskedarray relative > to numpy.ma? Nope, but I sure do see the advantages! -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R(206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point

[Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations : new developer zone wiki page

On Saturday 25 August 2007 15:48:00 Eric Firing wrote: > I've made a couple of small "emergency" edits, but a separate page would > make things much more visible and less confusing. So here it is: http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/MaskedArrayAlternative Please note the section : Optimizi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

I think it's reasonably safe to say at this point that most people are in favor of the new maskedarray implementation becoming the default numpy.ma at some point in the future. So the question is, when/how will the migration process be done? - just swap the whole thing as is and hope for the b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

Pierre GM wrote: > On Saturday 25 August 2007 12:50:38 Eric Firing wrote: >> Alexander Michael wrote: >>> Is there any documentation available for your maskedarray? >> Pierre wrote some notes about maskedarray here: >> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/MaskedArray >> starting half-way down

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

On Saturday 25 August 2007 12:50:38 Eric Firing wrote: > Alexander Michael wrote: > > Is there any documentation available for your maskedarray? > > Pierre wrote some notes about maskedarray here: > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/MaskedArray > starting half-way down the page. Please no

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

On 8/24/07, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like the direction of this work. For me, the biggest issue is whether > or not matplotlib (and other code depending on numpy.ma) works with it. > I'm pretty sure this can be handled and so, I'd personally like to see it. mpl already suppo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

Alexander Michael wrote: > Is there any documentation available for your maskedarray? I would > like to get a feel for the basics, like how do I take the dot product, > do elementwise multiplication, etc, with your implementation. > > Thanks, > Alex > __

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

Pierre GM wrote: > All, > > > > * Does anyone see any *disadvantages* to this aspect of maskedarray relative > to numpy.ma? > > * What would be the requisites to move maskedarray out of the sandbox ? We > hope to be able in the short term to either replace or at least merge the two > implemen

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

Is there any documentation available for your maskedarray? I would like to get a feel for the basics, like how do I take the dot product, do elementwise multiplication, etc, with your implementation. Thanks, Alex ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

On Friday 24 August 2007 20:49:17 David Goldsmith wrote: > Pierre GM wrote: > > * Does anyone see any *disadvantages* to this aspect of maskedarray > > relative to numpy.ma? > > What *is* numpy.ma derived from? If you're talking about numpy.ma arrays: A numpy.ma.MaskedArray is an independent obje

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

Pierre GM wrote: > * Does anyone see any *disadvantages* to this aspect of maskedarray relative > to numpy.ma? > What *is* numpy.ma derived from? DG -- ERD/ORR/NOS/NOAA ___ Numpy-discussion m

[Numpy-discussion] Maskedarray implementations

All, As you might be aware, there are currently two concurrent implementations of masked arrays in numpy: * numpy.ma is the official implementation, but it is unclear whether it is still actively maintained. * maskedarray is the alternative I've been developing initially for my own purpose from