On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
> Should be 6 in 1.6
>
> # Binary compatibility version number. This number is increased whenever the
> # C-API is changed such that binary compatibility is broken, i.e. whenever a
> # recompile of extension modules is needed.
> C_ABI_VERS
2012/4/24 Frédéric Bastien
> Hi,
>
> I finished reading the doc I listed in the other thread. As the NA
> stuff will be marked as Experimental in numpy 1.7, why not define a
> new macro like NPY_NA_VERSION that will give the version of the NA
> C-api? That way, people will be able to detect if th
Hi,
I finished reading the doc I listed in the other thread. As the NA
stuff will be marked as Experimental in numpy 1.7, why not define a
new macro like NPY_NA_VERSION that will give the version of the NA
C-api? That way, people will be able to detect if there is change in
the c-api of NA when th
Thank you very much for contributing this description.It is very helpful to
see how people use numpy.ma in the wild.
-Travis
On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
> Travis et al,
>
> This isn't a reply to anything specific in your email and I apologize
> if there is a better thr
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
> Travis et al,
>
> This isn't a reply to anything specific in your email and I apologize
> if there is a better thread or place to share this information. I've
> been meaning to participate in the discussion for a long time and
> never
Travis et al,
This isn't a reply to anything specific in your email and I apologize
if there is a better thread or place to share this information. I've
been meaning to participate in the discussion for a long time and
never got around to it. The main thing I'd like to is convey my
typical use of
10.04.2012 06:52, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
[clip]
> 4) I'm still not sure about whether the IGNORED
> concept is necessary or not. I really like the separation
> that was emphasized between implementation (masks versus
> bit-patterns) and operations (propagating versus non-propagating).
> P
On 04/09/2012 06:52 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been waiting for Mark Wiebe to arrive in Austin where he will
> spend several weeks, but I also know that masked arrays will be only
> one of the things he and I are hoping to make head-way on while he is
> in Austin.Nevertheles
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been waiting for Mark Wiebe to arrive in Austin where he will spend
> several weeks, but I also know that masked arrays will be only one of the
> things he and I are hoping to make head-way on while he is in Austin.
> Nev
Hey all,
I've been waiting for Mark Wiebe to arrive in Austin where he will spend
several weeks, but I also know that masked arrays will be only one of the
things he and I are hoping to make head-way on while he is in Austin.
Nevertheless, we need to make progress on the masked array discus
10 matches
Mail list logo
