> Nice, I am starting to get out of touch with too many packages...
> Would be nice to add DCT and DST support to it.
FWIW, the DCT has been in scipy.fftpack for a while and DST was just added.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:34 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
Those are not the original Fortran sources. The original Fortran
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:34 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>> Those are not the original Fortran sources. The original Fortran sources are
>>> in the public domain as work done by a US
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>> Those are not the original Fortran sources. The original Fortran sources are
>> in the public domain as work done by a US federal employee.
>>
>> http://www.netlib.org/fftpack/
>>
>> Ne
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:55:32AM +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> > Those are not the original Fortran sources. The original Fortran sources are
> > in the public domain as work done by a US federal employee.
> >
> > http://www.netlib.org/fftpa
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> Those are not the original Fortran sources. The original Fortran sources are
> in the public domain as work done by a US federal employee.
>
> http://www.netlib.org/fftpack/
>
> Never trust the license of any code on John Burkardt's site. Track
Those are not the original Fortran sources. The original Fortran sources
are in the public domain as work done by a US federal employee.
http://www.netlib.org/fftpack/
Never trust the license of any code on John Burkardt's site. Track it down
to the original sources.
On Monday, August 6, 2012, S
But the Fortran FFTPACK is GPL, or has the licence been changed?
http://people.sc.fsu.edu/~jburkardt/f77_src/fftpack5.1/fftpack5.1.html
Sturla
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 3. aug. 2012 kl. 07:52 skrev Travis Oliphant :
> This should be completely fine.The fftpack.h file indicates that fftpack
>
On 08/02/2012 10:44 PM, Damon McDougall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about the licence for NumPy's codebase. I am currently
> writing a library and I'd like to release under some BSD-type licence.
> Unfortunately, my choice to link against MIT's FFTW library (released
> under the GPL) means t
This should be completely fine.The fftpack.h file indicates that fftpack
code came from Tela originally anyway and was translated from the Fortran code
FFTPACK.
Good luck with your project.
-Travis
On Aug 2, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Damon McDougall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about th
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:44:53PM +0100, Damon McDougall wrote:
> I have a question about the licence for NumPy's codebase. I am currently
> writing a library and I'd like to release under some BSD-type licence.
> Unfortunately, my choice to link against MIT's FFTW library (released
> under the GP
Hi,
I have a question about the licence for NumPy's codebase. I am currently
writing a library and I'd like to release under some BSD-type licence.
Unfortunately, my choice to link against MIT's FFTW library (released
under the GPL) means that, in its current state, this is not possible.
I'm an av
12 matches
Mail list logo
