On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Sturla Molden
wrote:
> I just envisioned a Roman patron shouting veto or a US senator
> filibustering. Expulsion would be the appropriate recation, yes :-)
Oh if only the US Senate could expulse people!
-sigh
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emerg
There is the concept of consensus-driven development, which centers on veto
rights. It does assume that all actors are driven by a common goal to
improve the project. For example, the fact that we didn't have consensus
back during the whole NA brouhaha was actually a good thing because IMHO
includi
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Are you planning to go around vetoing things
I don't consider myself qualified.
> for ridiculous reasons and causing havoc?
That would be unpolite.
> And if not, then who is it that you're worried about?
I am not sure :)
I just envisioned a Roman patron shouting ve
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
>
> Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> > Thanks Chuck! It looks like it's just wording tweaks / clarifications
> > at this point, so nothing we need to discuss in detail on the list. If
> > anyone wants to watch the sausage being made, then the link is
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Thanks Chuck! It looks like it's just wording tweaks / clarifications
> at this point, so nothing we need to discuss in detail on the list. If
> anyone wants to watch the sausage being made, then the link is above
> :-), and we'll continue the discussion in the PR unless
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
[...]
>> I've just updated the governance document pull request with final
>> formatting tweaks, in case anyone wants to review the current text or
>> the (very minor and boring) cha
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > After some further thought and spending quite a bit of time re-reading
> the
> > discussion on a few threads, I now believe that my request to be on the
> >
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> After some further thought and spending quite a bit of time re-reading the
> discussion on a few threads, I now believe that my request to be on the
> steering council might be creating more trouble than it's worth. Noth
Hi everyone,
After some further thought and spending quite a bit of time re-reading the
discussion on a few threads, I now believe that my request to be on the
steering council might be creating more trouble than it's worth.
Nothing matters to me more than seeing NumPy continue to grow and improve
