A.S.: Some forewords, below the first paragraphs are annotated after I got to
the conclusion at the end of the email; read these annotation in square
brackets as if it were footnotes. The main point to grasp and keep in mind for
me was, when it comes to package hierarchies, that "import package.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>--- systems that try to "freeze" Python programs were
> particularly annoyed at SciPy's lazy import mechanism.
That's ironic to me -- while the solution to a lot of "freezing"
problems is to include everything including the kitchen sink --
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>> Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
> Note that my being opposed is because the benefits are smaller than the
> cost. If there was a better reason than shaving a couple of extra ms off the
> import time
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:31 AM, David Cournapeau
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the
>> > idea
>> > b
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:31 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
> > because it caused all sorts of problems on different platforms when it
> was
> >
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
> because it caused all sorts of problems on different platforms when it was
> tried in scipy. I thought I'd open the topic for discussion so that folks
On Jul 16, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
> because it caused all sorts of problems on different platforms when it was
> tried in
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
> because it caused all sorts of problems on different platforms when it was
> tried in scipy.
Note that my being opposed is because the benefits are
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:28:19AM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
>Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
>because it caused all sorts of problems on different platforms when it was
>tried in scipy. I thought I'd open the topic for discussion so that f
Hi All,
Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
because it caused all sorts of problems on different platforms when it was
tried in scipy. I thought I'd open the topic for discussion so that folks
who had various problems/solutions could offer input and the common
10 matches
Mail list logo
