Pierre GM wrote:
> All,
> I was fixing MaskedArray.view for masked arrays with flexible type when I ran
> into a small pb with view.
> The new definition accepts 2 keywords dtype and type. I thought I could
> easily
> redefined MaskedArray.view as
>
> def view(self, dtype=None, type=None):
>
All,
I was fixing MaskedArray.view for masked arrays with flexible type when I ran
into a small pb with view.
The new definition accepts 2 keywords dtype and type. I thought I could easily
redefined MaskedArray.view as
def view(self, dtype=None, type=None):
output = ndarray.view(self, dtype=d
