Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ironclad 0.8 released

2009-01-29 Thread William Reade
Hi Tim Thank you for your interest! To answer your various questions order of approximately increasing complexity: Most importantly: the currently available version of Resolver One does not have numpy support built in, and for various reasons I wouldn't advise trying to integrate Ironclad w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ironclad 0.8 released

2009-01-29 Thread Tim Michelsen
Hello William, once again. I just noticed that Resolver One can only import data from Excel. In science, the common low level data exchange format is ASCII text like: CSV or tab separated. You may consider adding this. I did not find any installation instructions contained in the docs for the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ironclad 0.8 released

2009-01-29 Thread Tim Michelsen
Hello William, > * A few performance improvements. > * Over 900 NumPy tests now pass: in fact, almost all the tests from the > core, fft, lib, linalg, ma, oldnumeric and random subpackages. I have some questions here for the science interested. I hope that they are not too specific: * Can you a

[Numpy-discussion] Ironclad 0.8 released

2009-01-29 Thread William Reade
Hi all I'm delighted to announce the release of Ironclad v0.8 -- the all-singing, all-dancing CPython API compatibility layer for IronPython -- available now from http://code.google.com/p/ironclad/ . Notable improvements over the last release include: * Ironclad is now a neatly self-contained