>> Hi,
>> Following Travis's suggestion below, I would like to suggest that the
>> following definitions be depreciated or removed in this forthcoming
>> release:
>>
>> numpy.Inf
>> numpy.Infinity
>> numpy.infty
>> numpy.PINF
>> numpy.NAN
>> numpy.NaN
> ...
>
> While this is being discussed, what a
On 15 Jul 2008, at 6:33 AM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> Hi,
> Following Travis's suggestion below, I would like to suggest that the
> following definitions be depreciated or removed in this forthcoming
> release:
>
> numpy.Inf
> numpy.Infinity
> numpy.infty
> numpy.PINF
> numpy.NAN
> numpy.NaN
...
W
Christopher Barker wrote:
> Jarrod Millman wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Bruce Southey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Following Travis's suggestion below, I would like to suggest that the
>>> following definitions be depreciated or removed in this forthcoming release:
>>>
Jarrod Millman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Bruce Southey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Following Travis's suggestion below, I would like to suggest that the
>> following definitions be depreciated or removed in this forthcoming release:
>>
>> numpy.Inf
>> numpy.Infinity
>> numpy.infty
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Bruce Southey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following Travis's suggestion below, I would like to suggest that the
> following definitions be depreciated or removed in this forthcoming release:
>
> numpy.Inf
> numpy.Infinity
> numpy.infty
> numpy.PINF
> numpy.NAN
> nu
Hi,
Following Travis's suggestion below, I would like to suggest that the
following definitions be depreciated or removed in this forthcoming release:
numpy.Inf
numpy.Infinity
numpy.infty
numpy.PINF
numpy.NAN
numpy.NaN
I am not sure about what would be best for numpy.NINF.
Thanks
Bruce
Trav
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> Bruce Southey wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Since we are discussing namespace and standardization, I am curious in
>> why there are multiple definitions for defining infinity in numpy when
>> perhaps there should be two (one for positive infinity and one for
>> negative infin
On 10/04/2008, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Southey wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Since we are discussing namespace and standardization, I am curious in
> > why there are multiple definitions for defining infinity in numpy when
> > perhaps there should be two (one for positive inf
Bruce Southey wrote:
> Hi,
> Since we are discussing namespace and standardization, I am curious in
> why there are multiple definitions for defining infinity in numpy when
> perhaps there should be two (one for positive infinity and one for
> negative infinity). I really do understand that othe
Hi,
Since we are discussing namespace and standardization, I am curious in
why there are multiple definitions for defining infinity in numpy when
perhaps there should be two (one for positive infinity and one for
negative infinity). I really do understand that other people have use of
these def
10 matches
Mail list logo